Economic sanctions and academia: Overlooked impact and long-term consequences
Autoři:
Louise Bezuidenhout aff001; Ola Karrar aff002; Javier Lezaun aff001; Andy Nobes aff003
Působiště autorů:
Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
aff001; Department of Statistics, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
aff002; INASP, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222669
Souhrn
Financial sanctions are often thought of as the “soft alternative” to armed conflict and are widely used in the 21st century. Nonetheless, sanctions are often criticized for being non-specific in their action, and having impact beyond their intended remit. One often-overlooked area affected by sanctions are academic systems of research and education. Sanctions place “invisible barriers” for research in these countries by limiting access to necessary resources and curtailing their effective use. In this paper we present a national survey of Sudanese academics focused on the impact of 20 years of economic sanctions on their work. It identifies key areas of academic research and education that have been impacted by international sanctions. Moreover, these data highlight how the impact of sanctions on academia is likely to persist long after they are formally lifted. The paper concludes by problematising the current interpretation of jus post bellum, or moral behaviour after conflict. It suggests that the responsibility to make reparations in the form of support for academic systems applies to countries who impose economic sanctions.
Klíčová slova:
Economics – Surveys – Equipment – Finance – Government funding of science – Research grants – Sudan – Economic impact analysis
Zdroje
1. Pape R., “Why economic sanctions do not work,” Int. Secur., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 90–136, 1997.
2. Drezner D. W., “Targeted Sanctions in a World of Global Finance,” Int. Interact., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 755–764, Aug. 2015.
3. Pattison J., “Economic Sanctions,” in The Alternatives to War: From Sanctions to Nonviolence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
4. Office of Foreign Assets Control, “Sanctions Programs and Information,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Pages/default.aspx. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
5. Office of Foreign Assets Control, “Where is OFAC’s Country List? What countries do I need to worry about in terms of U.S. sanctions?,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/faq_10_page.aspx. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
6. Mack A. and Khan A., “The Efficacy of UN Sanctions,” Secur. Dialogue, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 279–292, Sep. 2000.
7. O’Driscoll D., “Impact of economic sanctions on poverty and economic growth—GSDRC,” Brighton, 2017.
8. Gordon J., “Cool War: Economic sanctions as a,” Harper’s Magazine, 2002.
9. Gordon J., Invisible war: the United States and the Iraq sanctions. Harvard University Press, 2010.
10. Peksen D., “Better or worse? The effect of economic sanctions on human rights,” J. Peace Res., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 59–77, 2009.
11. H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development.” 01-Jan-1995.
12. Maxmen A., “Sudan Sanctions Deprive ‘Whole Nation’ of Health Care,” Foreign Policy, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/14/sudan-sanctions-deprive-whole-nation-of-health-care/. [Accessed: 15-Aug-2019].
13. De Santisteban A. V., “Sanctions, War, Occupation and the De-Development of Education in Iraq,” Int. Rev. Educ. Int. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/ Rev. Int. l’éducation, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 59–71, Jan. 2005.
14. Al-Obaidi A., Corcoran T., and Scarth L., “Psychosocial research with children in Iraq—current health practice and policy in a context of armed conflict,” Int. Psychiatry, vol. 10, pp. 72–74, 2013. 31507742
15. Rezaee-Zavareh M. S., Karimi-Sari H., and Alavian S. M., “Iran, sanctions, and research collaborations,” Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10013, pp. 28–29, Jan. 2016.
16. Saeidnia S. and Abdollahi M., “Consequences of international sanctions on Iranian scientists and the basis of science.,” Hepat. Mon., vol. 13, no. 9, p. e14843, 2013. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.14843 24282428
17. Zahediasl S., “Iran and science publishing: an open letter,” Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9892, p. 596, Aug. 2013.
18. Arie S., “Unintended consequences of sanctions against Iran.,” BMJ, vol. 347, p. f4650, Jul. 2013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4650 23881946
19. Afshari R. and Bhopal R. S., “Iran, sanctions, and collaborations,” Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10023, pp. 1055–1056, Mar. 2016.
20. Hodges A., Cosmologies in Transition: Science and the Politics of Academia after Yugoslavia. Podgorica: Aquamarine Press, 2017.
21. Savić M., Ivanović M., Radovanović M., Ognjanović Z., Pejović A., and Jakšić Krüger T., “The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals,” Scientometrics, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1805–1830, Dec. 2014.
22. Haricombe L. J., “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies to Study the Effects of an Academic Boycott on Academics in South Africa,” Libr. Q., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 508–527, Oct. 1993.
23. Wolhuter C., Higgs P., Higgs L., and Ntshoe I., “Key challenges facing the South African academic profession at the interfaces of management, interaction with the international academic community and service for society,” Africa Educ. Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 269–282, Oct. 2009.
24. Stone R., “Help Needed to Rebuild Science in Yugoslavia.,” Science (80-.)., vol. 290, no. 5492, pp. 690–5, Oct. 2000.
25. Malik M., “The Efficacy of United States Sanctions on the Republic of Sudan,” J. Georg. Univ. Middle East. Stud. Student Assoc., 2015.
26. Shibeika A., “In Sudan, U.S. Sanctions Cripple Higher Education,” Al-Fanar Media, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2016/07/in-sudan-u-s-sanctions-cripple-higher-education/. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
27. Office of Foreign Assets Control, “Sudan and Darfur Sanctions,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/pages/sudan.aspx. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
28. Office of Foreign Assets Control, Sudanese Sanctions Regulations 31 C.F.R. Part 538. 2913.
29. Nordling L., “Sudan seeks a science revival.,” Science (80-.)., vol. 358, no. 6369, p. 1369, Dec. 2017.
30. Bezuidenhout L., “Technology Transfer and True Transformation: Implications for Open Data,” Data Sci. J., vol. 16, pp. 1–26, May 2017.
31. Bourdieu P., “The Forms of Capital [Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital],” in Soziale Ungleichheiten (Soziale Welt, Sonderheft 2), Kreckel R. and (Richard Nice Translator), Eds. Goettingen: Otto Schartz & Co, 1983.
32. The Economist, “Why America has lifted sanctions on Sudan,” The Economist, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/10/10/why-america-has-lifted-sanctions-on-sudan. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
33. United Nations, “Head of Sudan Sanctions Committee Briefs Security Council as Delegates Debate Criteria for Lifting 13-Year-Old Measures, Ongoing Sexual Violence,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/sc13668.doc.htm.
34. Elmileik A., “What prompted the protests in Sudan?,” Aljazeera, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/12/prompted-protests-sudan-181224114651302.html.
35. Walsh D. and Goldstein J., “Sudan’s President Omar Hassan al-Bashir Is Ousted, but Not His Regime,” New York Times, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/world/africa/sudan-omar-hassan-al-bashir.html. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
36. Walsh D., “Sudan Power-Sharing Deal Reached by Military and Civilian Leaders,” New York Times, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/04/world/africa/sudan-power-sharing-deal.html. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
37. Opeskin B. R., “The moral foundations of foreign aid,” World Dev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 21–44, Jan. 1996.
38. Iasiello L. V., “Jus Post Bellum,” Nav. War Coll. Rev., vol. 57, pp. 1–30, 2004.
39. Orend B., “Kant’s ethics of war and peace,” J. Mil. Ethics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 161–177, Jun. 2004.
40. Paris R., “Preface,” in At War’s End, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. ix–xii.
41. Bellamy A. J., “The Responsibilities of Victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War,” Rev. Int. Stud., vol. 34, pp. 601–625, 2008.
42. BBC, “Why the end of US sanctions hasn’t helped Sudan—BBC News,” BBC, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-44711355. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2019].
43. N. Tschirgi, “Peacebuilding as the Link between Security and Development: Is the Window of Opportunity Closing? International Peace Academy Studies in Security and Development,” New York, 2003.
44. African Union, “Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy for Africa 2024,” Addis Ababa, 2014.
45. International Council for Science, InterAcademy Partnership, International Social Science Council, and World Academy of Science, “Open Data in a Big Data World,” Paris, 2015.
46. Morgan H., “Lifting US santions on Sudan didn’t help its economy,” Aljazeera, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/10/lifting-sanctions-sudan-didnt-economy-181026141229929.html.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis