Does task delegation to non-physician health professionals improve quality of diabetes care? Results of a scoping review
Autoři:
Sanas Mirhoseiny aff001; Tjarko Geelvink aff001; Stephan Martin aff002; Horst Christian Vollmar aff004; Stephanie Stock aff001; Marcus Redaelli aff001
Působiště autorů:
Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
aff001; Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
aff002; West-German Center of Diabetes and Health, Düsseldorf Catholic Hospital Group, Düsseldorf, Germany
aff003; Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gebäude MAFO 1/61, Bochum, Germany
aff004; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
aff005
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Collection Review
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223159
Souhrn
Objective
As a result of unhealthy lifestyles, reduced numbers of healthcare providers are having to deal with an increasing number of diabetes patients. In light of this shortage of physicians and nursing staff, new concepts of care are needed. The aim of this scoping review is to review the literature and examine the effects of task delegation to non-physician health professionals, with a further emphasis on inter-professional care.
Research design and methods
Systematic searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases to retrieve papers published between January 1994 and December 2017. Randomised/non-randomised controlled trials and studies with a before/after design that described the delegation of tasks from physicians to non-physicians in diabetes care were included in the search. This review is a subgroup analysis that further assesses all the studies conducted using a team-based approach.
Results
A total of 45 studies with 12,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most of the interventions were performed in an outpatient setting with type-2 diabetes mellitus patients. The non-physician healthcare professionals involved in the team were nurses, pharmacists, community health workers and dietitians. Most studies showed significant improvements in glycaemic control and high patient satisfaction, while there were no indications that the task delegation affected quality of life scores.
Conclusions
The findings of the review suggest that task delegation can provide equivalent glycaemic control and potentially lead to an improvement in the quality of care. However, this review revealed a lack of clinical endpoints, as well as an inconsistency between the biochemical outcome parameters and the patient-centred outcome parameters. Given the vast differences between the individual healthcare systems used around the world, further high-quality research with an emphasis on long-term outcome effects and the expertise of non-physicians is needed.
Klíčová slova:
Physicians – Nurses – Patients – Preventive medicine – Pharmacists – Community based intervention
Zdroje
1. World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes. Geneva, Switzerland; 2016. (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream10665/204871/1/9789241565257_eng.pdf (Retrieved 06/12/2017).
2. Busse R, Blümel M, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Zentner A. Tackling chronic disease in Europe: strategies, interventions and challenges. WHO Observatory Studies Series N°20. Geneva, Switzerland: p 9–24; 2010. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/96632/E93736.pdf (Retrieved 06/17/2017).
3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas Seventh Edition. Brussel, Belgium:p. 48–50; 2015. http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2015-atlas.html (Retrieved 06/18/2017).
4. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2010;87(1):4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 19896746
5. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8 27061677
6. Tamayo T, Rosenbauer J, Wild S, Spijkerman A, Baan C, Forouhi N, et al. Diabetes in Europe: an update. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2014;103(2):206–17. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.007 24300019
7. Li R, Bilik D, Brown MB, Zhang P, Ettner SL, Ackermann RT, et al. Medical costs associated with type 2 diabetes complications and comorbidities. American journal of managed care. 2013;19(5):421–30. 23781894
8. Assal J, Groop L. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. World Health Organization, Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance Geneva, Switzerland: p. 1–65; 1999. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/66040/1/WHO_NCD_NCS_99.2.pdf (Retrieved 06/17/2017).
9. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. British medical journal. 2000;321(7258):405–12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405 10938048
10. Dall TM, Narayan KV, Gillespie KB, Gallo PD, Blanchard TD, Solcan M, et al. Detecting type 2 diabetes and prediabetes among asymptomatic adults in the United States: modeling American Diabetes Association versus US Preventive Services Task Force diabetes screening guidelines. Population health metrics. 2014;12(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-12-1
11. Rathmann W, Haastert B, Icks Aa, Löwel H, Meisinger C, Holle R, et al. High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Southern Germany: target populations for efficient screening. The KORA survey 2000. Diabetologia. 2003;46(2):182–9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-1025-0 12627316
12. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, Wang F, Osmond D, Daher C, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. Journal of American medical association. 2002;288(4):475–82.
13. Østbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Annals of family medicine. 2005;3(3):209–14. doi: 10.1370/afm.310 15928223
14. Dansky KH, Dirani R. The use of health care services by people with diabetes in rural areas. Journal of rural health. 1998;14(2):129–37. 9715001
15. Machado M, Bajcar J, Guzzo GC, Einarson TR. Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part I: systematic review and meta-analysis in diabetes management. Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2007;41(10):1569–82. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K151 17712043
16. Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. British medical journal. 2002;324(7341):819–23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819 11934775
17. Wubben DP, Vivian EM. Effects of pharmacist outpatient interventions on adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(4):421–36. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.4.421 18363526
18. Loveman E, Royle P, Waugh N. Specialist nurses in diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2003;(2):CD003286.
19. Laurant M, van der Biezen M, Wijers N, Watananirun K, Kontopantelis E, van Vught AJ. Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018(7):1–123.
20. Sibbald B, Shen J, McBride A. Changing the skill-mix of the health care workforce. Journal of health services research & policy. 2004;9 Suppl 1:28–38.
21. Yarnall KSH, Østbye T, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Family Physicians as Team Leaders: “Time” to Share the Care. Preventing chronic disease. 2009;6(2):A59. 19289002
22. Hutchison RW. Treating diabetes in underserved populations using an interprofessional care team. Journal of interprofessional care. 2014;28(6):568–9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.917408 24828621
23. Arevian M. The significance of a collaborative practice model in delivering care to chronically ill patients: A case study of managing diabetes mellitus in a primary health care center. Journal of interprofessional care. 2005;19(5):444–51. doi: 10.1080/13561820500215095 16308168
24. Levetan CS, Salas JR, Wilets IF, Zumoff B. Impact of endocrine and diabetes team consultation on hospital length of stay for patients with diabetes. The American Journal of Medicine. 1995;99(1):22–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80100-4 7598138
25. Puig J, Supervía A, Márquez M, Flores J, Cano J, Gutiérrez J. Diabetes team consultation: impact on length of stay of diabetic patients admitted to a short-stay unit. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;78(2):211–6. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.03.010 17481769
26. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank memorial fund quarterly. 1966;44(3):166–206.
27. Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology. 2018;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x 30453902
28. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
29. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine. 2018;169(7):467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850 30178033
30. Sur RL, Dahm P. History of evidence-based medicine. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(4):487–9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.91438 22279315
31. Geelvink T, Mirhoseiny S, Vollmar H, Stock S, Redaèlli M. Ökonomische Potentiale der Delegation mit und ohne Telemedizin bei Menschen mit Diabetes Mellitus–Ergebnisse einer Subgruppenanalyse eines Scoping Reviews. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement. 2017;22(05):237–43.
32. Bradley C. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire: DTSQ. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. 1994:111–32.
33. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care. 1992:473–83. 1593914
34. Christiansen S, Klötzer J. Telemedicine for heart failure, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Versicherungsmedizin. 2016;68(1):20–2. 27111954
35. Marcolino MS, Maia JX, Alkmim MBM, Boersma E, Ribeiro AL. Telemedicine application in the care of diabetes patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS one. 2013;8(11.e79246):1–13.
36. Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Doll H, Bower P, et al. Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. British medical journal. 2013;346.f653:1–20.
37. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, Hutton B, McGill S, Palmer K. Home telehealth for diabetes management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2009;11(10):913–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01057.x 19531058
38. Suksomboon N, Poolsup N, Nge YL. Impact of phone call intervention on glycemic control in diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. PloS one. 2014;9(2.e89207):1–7.
39. Clark CE, Smith LF, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Nurse‐led interventions used to improve control of high blood pressure in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetic Medicine. 2011;28(3):250–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03204.x 21309833
40. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. British medical journal. 2000;320(7234):569–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.569 10688568
41. Litaker D, MION LC, Planavsky L, Kippes C, Mehta N, Frolkis J. Physician–nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients' perception of care. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2003;17(3):223–37. doi: 10.1080/1356182031000122852 12850874
42. Schunk M, Reitmeir P, Schipf S, Völzke H, Meisinger C, Thorand B, et al. Health‐related quality of life in subjects with and without Type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of five population‐based surveys in Germany. Diabetic Mededicine. 2012;29(5):646–53.
43. Sparring V, Nyström L, Wahlström R, Jonsson PM, Östman J, Burström K. Diabetes duration and health-related quality of life in individuals with onset of diabetes in the age group 15–34 years–a Swedish population-based study using EQ-5D. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):1–11.
44. Lloyd CE, Orchard TJ. Physical and psychological well-being in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Research Clinical Practice. 1999;44(1):9–19. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00004-2 10414935
45. Huang G-H, Palta M, Allen C, LeCaire T, D’Alessio D. Self-rated health among young people with type 1 diabetes in relation to risk factors in a longitudinal study. American journal of epidemiology. 2004;159(4):364–72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh055 14769640
46. Munshi MN, Florez H, Huang ES, Kalyani RR, Mupanomunda M, Pandya N, et al. Management of diabetes in long-term care and skilled nursing facilities: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(2):308–18. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2512 26798150
47. McCallin A. Interdisciplinary practice–a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review. Journal of clinical nursing. 2001;10(4):419–28. 11822488
48. Sorrells-Jones J. The challenge of making it real: interdisciplinary practice in a" seamless" organization. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 1997;21(2):20–30. 9069949
49. Shortell SM, Marsteller JA, Lin M, Pearson ML, Wu S-Y, Mendel P, et al. The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care. Medical care. 2004;42(11):1040–8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200411000-00002 15586830
50. Porter ME, Pabo EA, Lee TH. Redesigning primary care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients’ needs. Health Affairs. 2013;32(3):516–25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0961 23459730
51. Gucciardi E, Espin S, Morganti A, Dorado L. Exploring interprofessional collaboration during the integration of diabetes teams into primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):1–14.
52. Molyneux J. Interprofessional teamworking: what makes teams work well? Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2001;15(1):29–35. 11705068
53. Kempf K, Altpeter B, Berger J, Reuß O, Fuchs M, Schneider M, et al. Efficacy of the Telemedical Lifestyle intervention Program TeLiPro in Advanced Stages of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(7):863–71. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0303 28500214
54. de Sonnaville JJ, Bouma M, Colly LP, Deville W, Wijkel D, Heine RJ. Sustained good glycaemic control in NIDDM patients by implementation of structured care in general practice: 2-year follow-up study. Diabetologia. 1997;40(11):1334–40. doi: 10.1007/s001250050829 9389427
55. Koproski J, Pretto Z, Poretsky I. Effects of an intervention by a diabetes team in hospitalized patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(10):1553–5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.10.1553 9314634
56. Goddijn PP, Bilo HJ, Feskens EJ, Groeniert KH, van der Zee KI, Meyboom-de Jong B. Longitudinal study on glycaemic control and quality of life in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus referred for intensified control. Diabetic medicine. 1999;16(1):23–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00002.x 10229289
57. Ridgeway NA, Harvill DR, Harvill LM, Falin TM, Forester GM, Gose OD (1999). Improved control of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a practical education/behavior modification program in a primary care clinic. Southern medical journal. 1999;92(7):667–72. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199907000-00004 10414474
58. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, Michalik D, Mendlowitz D, Roller S, et.al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(12): 2011–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.2011 10587835
59. Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, Galvin MS, McGregor M, Artz K, et al. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(4):695–700. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.695 11315833
60. Brown SA, Garcia AA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: the Starr County border health initiative. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):259–68. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.2.259 11815493
61. Keyserling TC, Samuel-Hodge CD, Ammerman AS, Ainsworth BE, Henriquez-Roldan CF, Elasy TA, et al. A randomized trial of an intervention to improve self-care behaviors of African-American women with type 2 diabetes: impact on physical activity. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(9):1576–83. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1576 12196430
62. Raji A, Gomes H, Beard JO, MacDonald P, Conlin PR. A randomized trial comparing intensive and passive education in patients with diabetes mellitus. Archives of internal medicine. 2002;162(11):1301–4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.11.1301 12038949
63. Gary TL, Bone LR, Hill MN, Levine DM, McGuire M, Saudek C, Brancati FL. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker interventions on risk factors for diabetes-related complications in urban African Americans. Preventive medicine. 2003;37(1):23–32. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00040-9 12799126
64. Izquierdo RE, Knudson PE, Meyer S, Kearns J, Ploutz-Snyder R, Weinstock RS. A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1002–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1002 12663564
65. Litaker D, Mion L, Planavsky L, Kippes C, Mehta N, Frolkis J. Physician—nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients' perception of care. Journal of interprofessional care. 2003;17(3):223–37. doi: 10.1080/1356182031000122852 12850874
66. Majumdar SR, Guirguis LM, Toth EL, Lewanczuk RZ, Lee TK, Johnson JA. Controlled trial of a multifaceted intervention for improving quality of care for rural patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3061–6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3061 14578240
67. So WY, Tong PC, Ko GT, Leung WY, Chow CC, Yeung VT, et al. Effects of protocol-driven care versus usual outpatient clinic care on survival rates in patients with type 2 diabetes. The American journal of managed care. 2003;9(9):606–15. 14527106
68. California Medi-Cal Type 2 Diabetes Study Group. Closing the gap: effect of diabetes case management on glycemic control among low-income ethnic minority populations: the California Medi-Cal type 2 diabetes study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):95–103. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.95 14693973
69. Maislos M, Weisman D. Multidisciplinary approach to patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, randomized study. Acta Diabetologica. 2004;41(2):44–8. doi: 10.1007/s00592-004-0143-1 15224204
70. O'Hare JP, Raymond NT, Mughal S, Dodd L, Hanif W, Ahmad Y, Mishra K, Jones A, Kumar S, Szczepura A, Hillhouse EW, Barnett AH, UKPDS Study Group. Evaluation of delivery of enhanced diabetes care to patients of South Asian ethnicity: the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study (UKADS). Diabetic Medicine. 2004;21(12):1357–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01373.x 15569141
71. Philis-Tsimikas A, Walker C, Rivard L, Talavera G, Reimann JO, Salmon M, et al. Improvement in diabetes care of underinsured patients enrolled in project dulce: a community-based, culturally appropriate, nurse case management and peer education diabetes care model. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):110–5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.110 14693975
72. Dijkstra RF, Braspenning JC, Huijsmans Z, Akkermans RP, van Ballegooie E, ten Have P, et al. Introduction of diabetes passports involving both patients and professionals to improve hospital outpatient diabetes care. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2005;68(2):126–34. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.09.020 15860240
73. Keers JC, Groen H, Sluiter WJ, Bouma J, Links TP. Cost and benefits of a multidisciplinary intensive diabetes education programme. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2005;11(3):293–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00536.x 15869559
74. Rothman RL, Malone R, Bryant B, Shintani AK, Crigler B, Dewalt DA, et al. A randomized trial of a primary care-based disease management program to improve cardiovascular risk factors and glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with diabetes. American journal of medicine. 2005;118(3):276–84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.09.017 15745726
75. Taylor KI, Oberle KM, Crutcher RA, Norton PG. Promoting health in type 2 diabetes: nurse-physician collaboration in primary care. Biological research for nursing. 2005;6(3):207–15. doi: 10.1177/1099800404272223 15583361
76. Jansa M, Vidal M, Viaplana J, Levy I, Conget I, Gomis R, et al. Telecare in a structured therapeutic education programme addressed to patients with type 1 diabetes and poor metabolic control. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2006;74(1):26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.03.005 16621113
77. Chan JC, So WY, Yeung CY, Ko GT, Lau IT, Tsang MW, et al. Effects of structured versus usual care on renal endpoint in type 2 diabetes: the SURE study: a randomized multicenter translational study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):977–82. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1908 19460913
78. Gary TL, Batts-Turner M, Yeh HC, Hill-Briggs F, Bone LR, Wang NY, et al. The effects of a nurse case manager and a community health worker team on diabetic control, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of internal medicine. 2009;169(19):1788–94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.338 19858437
79. Kim MT, Han HR, Song HJ, Lee JE, Kim J, Ryu JP, et al. A community-based, culturally tailored behavioral intervention for Korean Americans with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes educator. 2009;35(6):986–94. doi: 10.1177/0145721709345774 19934458
80. Whittemore R, Melkus G, Wagner J, Dziura J, Northrup V, Grey M. Translating the diabetes prevention program to primary care: a pilot study. Nursing research. 2009;58(1):2–12. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818fcef3 19092550
81. Edelman D, Fredrickson SK, Melnyk SD, Coffman CJ, Jeffreys AS, Datta S, et al. Medical clinics versus usual care for patients with both diabetes and hypertension: a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2010;152(11):689–96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00001 20513826
82. Mayes PA, Silvers A, Prendergast JJ. New direction for enhancing quality in diabetes care: utilizing telecommunications and paraprofessional outreach workers backed by an expert medical team. Telemedicine journal and e-health. 2010;16(3):358–63. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0110 20406123
83. Fokkens AS, Wiegersma PA, Beltman FW, Reijneveld SA. Structured primary care for type 2 diabetes has positive effects on clinical outcomes. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2011;17(6):1083–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01466.x 20626538
84. Naik AD, Teal CR, Rodriguez E, Haidet P. Knowing the ABCs: a comparative effectiveness study of two methods of diabetes education. Patient education and counseling. 2011;85(3):383–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.010 21300516
85. Weinger K, Beverly EA, Lee Y, Sitnokov L, Ganda OP, Caballero AE. The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of internal medicine. 2011;171(22):1990–9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.502 21986346
86. Chan CW, Siu SC, Wong CK, Lee VW (2012). A pharmacist care program: positive impact on cardiac risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. 2012;17(1):57–64. doi: 10.1177/1074248410396216 21335480
87. Debussche X, Rollot O, Le Pommelet C, Fianu A, Le Moullec N, Regnier C, et al. Quarterly individual outpatients lifestyle counseling after initial inpatients education on type 2 diabetes: the REDIA Prev-2 randomized controlled trial in Reunion Island. Diabetes & metabolism. 2012;38(1):46–53.
88. McFarland M, Davis K, Wallace J, Wan J, Cassidy R, Morgan T, et al. Use of home telehealth monitoring with active medication therapy management by clinical pharmacists in veterans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;32(5):420–6. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01038.x 22488512
89. Toledo FG, Triola A, Ruppert K, Siminerio LM. Telemedicine consultations: an alternative model to increase access to diabetes specialist care in underserved rural communities. JMIR research protocols.2012;1(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2235 23612044
90. DePue JD, Dunsiger S, Seiden AD, Blume J, Rosen RK, Goldstein MG, et al. Nurse-community health worker team improves diabetes care in American Samoa: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):1947–53. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1969 23393217
91. Levin K, Madsen JR, Petersen I, Wanscher CE, Hangaard J. Telemedicine diabetes consultations are cost-effective, and effects on essential diabetes treatment parameters are similar to conventional treatment: 7-year results from the Svendborg Telemedicine Diabetes Project. Journal of diabetes science and technology. 2013;7(3):587–95. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700302 23759390
92. Russell AW, Baxter KA, Askew DA, Tsai J, Ware RS, Jackson CL. Model of care for the management of complex Type 2 diabetes managed in the community by primary care physicians with specialist support: an open controlled trial. Diabetic medicine. 2013;30(9):1112–21. doi: 10.1111/dme.12251 23758279
93. Liou J-K, Soon M-S, Chen C-H, Huang T-F, Chen Y-P, Yeh Y-P, et al. Shared care combined with telecare improves glycemic control of diabetic patients in a rural underserved community. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2014;20(2):175–78. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0037 24320193
94. Chen J-H, Ou H-T, Lin T-C, Lai EC-C, Kao Y-HY. Pharmaceutical care of elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. International journal of clinical pharmacy. 2016;38(1):88–95. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0210-4 26499503
95. Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, Allen E, Cairns J, Smith F, et al. Effectiveness of a structured educational intervention using psychological delivery methods in children and adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the CASCADE intervention. British medical journal Open: Diabetes research and care. 2016;4(1):e000165.
96. Clapin H, Hop L, Ritchie E, Jayabalan R, Evans M, Browne‐Cooper K, Peter S, et al. Home‐based vs inpatient education for children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric diabetes. 2017;18(7):579–87. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12466 27807908
97. Garg R, Hurwitz S, Rein R, Schuman B, Underwood P, Bhandari S. Effect of follow-up by a hospital diabetes care team on diabetes control at one year after discharge from the hospital. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2017;133:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.014 28898714
98. Siaw M, Ko Y, Malone DC, Tsou K, Lew YJ, Foo D, Tan E, et al. Impact of pharmacist‐involved collaborative care on the clinical, humanistic and cost outcomes of high‐risk patients with type 2 diabetes (IMPACT): a randomized controlled trial. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2017;42(4):475–82. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12536 28449205
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Eliquis (apixaban) nově hrazen ze zdravotního pojištění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis
- Prevalence of pectus excavatum (PE), pectus carinatum (PC), tracheal hypoplasia, thoracic spine deformities and lateral heart displacement in thoracic radiographs of screw-tailed brachycephalic dogs