Longitudinal assessment of post-surgical physical activity in endometrial and ovarian cancer patients
Autoři:
Jessica Gorzelitz aff001; Erin S. Costanzo aff002; Ryan J. Spencer aff003; Meredith Rumble aff002; Stephen L. Rose aff003; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
aff001; Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
aff002; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223791
Souhrn
Objective
Physical activity plays a key role in cancer survivorship. The purpose of this investigation was to (a) describe the post-surgical physical activity trajectories of endometrial (n = 65) and ovarian (n = 31) cancer patients and (b) identify clinical and demographic predictors of physical activity over time.
Methods
96 participants wore an Actiwatch accelerometer for three days at each of three time points (one week, one month and four months) after surgical intervention for their endometrial or ovarian cancer diagnosis. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed effects regression modeling in SAS 9.4.
Results
For both tumor types, although physical activity levels increased with time after surgery, even at four months patients were performing only a small fraction of the 150 minutes of recommended weekly moderate to vigorous physical activity. At 1 week, subjects were completing on average 14 minutes/week (SD = 4) of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, compared to 14 minutes/week (SD = 2) of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at four months post-surgery (p < .05). Better self-rated health was associated with higher physical activity (p = 0.02) in endometrial cancer survivors only. BMI, age, surgery type and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with activity over time.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that physical activity levels are different for those with better self-rated health, but those individuals are still insufficiently active. This study adds new information describing the trajectories and variables that influence physical activity in gynecologic cancer survivors after surgery and highlights the need for health promotion interventions in this population.
Klíčová slova:
Physical activity – Health informatics – Cancer detection and diagnosis – Surgical and invasive medical procedures – Accelerometers – Surgical oncology – Ovarian cancer – Uterine cancer
Zdroje
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442 29313949
2. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–71. doi: 10.3322/caac.21235 24890451
3. Arem H, Irwin ML. Obesity and endometrial cancer survival: A systematic review. Int J Obes (2005). 2013;37(5):634–9.
4. Moorman PG, Jones LW, Akushevich L, Schildkraut JM. Recreational physical activity and ovarian cancer risk and survival. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(3):178–87. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.10.014 21296269
5. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801–9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351 16534088
6. Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: A systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541–56. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437 28708630
7. McTiernan A, Friedenreich CM, Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Macko R, Buchner D, et al. Physical activity in cancer prevention and survival: A systematic review. MSSE. 2019;51(6):1252–61.
8. Strasser B, Steindorf K, Wiskemann J, Ulrich CM. Impact of resistance training in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis. MSSE. 2013;45(11):2080–90.
9. Fong DYT, Ho JWC, Hui BPH, Lee AM, Macfarlane DJ, Leung SSK. Physical activity for cancer survivors: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344.
10. Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(11):815–40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs207 22570317
11. Lin LL, Brown JC, Segal S, Schmitz KH. Quality of life, body mass index, and physical activity among uterine cancer patients. IJGC. 2014;24(6):1027–32. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000166 24927246
12. Rossi A, Garber CE, Kaur G, Xue X, Goldberg GL, Nevadunsky NS. Physical activity-related differences in body mass index and patient-reported quality of life in socioculturally diverse endometrial cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(7):2169–77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3622-y 28210862
13. Zhang X, McClean D, Ko E, Morgan MA, Schmitz K. Exercise among women with ovarian cancer: A feasibility and pre-/post-test exploratory pilot study. Oncology nursing forum. 2017;44(3):366–74. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.366-374 28635971
14. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):242–74.
15. Littman AJ, Tang M-T, Rossing MA. Longitudinal study of recreational physical activity in breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):119–27. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0113-2 20180037
16. Brunet J, Amireault S, Chaiton M, Sabiston CM. Identification and prediction of physical activity trajectories in women treated for breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(11):837–42. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.07.004 25174285
17. Chung JY, Lee DH, Park J-H, Lee MK, Kang D-W, Min J, et al. Patterns of physical activity participation across the cancer trajectory in colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(6):1605–12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1703-5 23292698
18. Lucas AR, Levine BJ, Avis NE. Posttreatment trajectories of physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2017;123(14):2773–80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30641 28272835
19. Rossi A, Frechette L, Miller D, Miller E, Friel C, Van Arsdale A, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2018.
20. von Gruenigen VE, Waggoner SE, Frasure HE, Kavanagh MB, Janata JW, Rose PG, et al. Lifestyle challenges in endometrial cancer survivorship. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(1):93–100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820205b3 21173649
21. von Gruenigen VE, Frasure HE, Jenison EL, Hopkins MP, Gil KM. Longitudinal assessment of quality of life and lifestyle in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients: The roles of surgery and chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(1):120–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.059 16556458
22. Stevinson C, Steed H, Faught W, Tonkin K, Vallance JK, Ladha AB, et al. Physical activity in ovarian cancer survivors: Associations with fatigue, sleep, and psychosocial functioning. IJGC. 2009;19(1):73–8. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e31819902ec 19258945
23. Mizrahi D, Naumann F, Broderick C, Samara J, Ryan M, Friedlander M. Quantifying physical activity and the associated barriers for women with ovarian cancer. IJGC. 2015;25(4):577–83. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000349 25628105
24. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56 18990237
25. Gorzelitz J, Peppard PE, Malecki K, Gennuso K, Nieto FJ, Cadmus-Bertram L. Predictors of discordance in self-report versus device-measured physical activity measurement. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(7):427–31. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.016 29681429
26. Thraen-Borowski KM, Gennuso KP, Cadmus-Bertram L. Accelerometer-derived physical activity and sedentary time by cancer type in the United States. PloS one. 2017;12(8):e0182554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182554 28806753
27. Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM. Riding the crest of the teachable moment: Promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5814–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.230 16043830
28. Rumble ME, Rose SL, White KH, Moore AH, Gehrman P, Benca RM, et al. Circadian actigraphic rest-activity rhythms following surgery for endometrial cancer: A prospective, longitudinal study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(3):448–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.001 25906914
29. Ware JE Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care. 1992;30(6):473–83. 1593914
30. Routen A, Upton D, Edwards M, Peters D. Intra-and inter-instrument reliability of the actiwatch 4 accelerometer in a mechanical laboratory setting. J Hum Kinet. 2012;31:17–24. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0002-z 23487398
31. Martikainen S, Pesonen A-K, Lahti J, Heinonen K, Tammelin T, Kajantie E, et al. Muddying the waters. J Pediatr. 2013;162(5):1082–4.
32. Montgomery-Downs HE, Insana SP, Bond JA. Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device. Sleep Breath. 2012;16(3):913–7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-011-0585-y 21971963
33. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr., O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. MSSE. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S450–6.
34. Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, Bowles HR. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. MSSE. 2012;44(1 Suppl 1):S68–76.
35. Ovesen L, Hannibal J, Mortensen EL. The interrelationship of weight loss, dietary intake, and quality of life in ambulatory patients with cancer of the lung, breast, and ovary. 1993. doi: 10.1080/01635589309514246 8502586
36. Parks SE, Housemann RA, Brownson RC. Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. 2003;57(1):29–35. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.1.29 12490645
37. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258–71.
38. Robertson MC, Lyons EJ, Song J, Cox-Martin M, Li Y, Green CE, et al. Change in physical activity and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention. Health Qual Life Out. 2019;17(1):91.
39. Maxwell‐Smith C, Hince D, Cohen PA, Bulsara MK, Boyle T, Platell C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of WATAAP to promote physical activity in colorectal and endometrial cancer survivors. Psycho‐Oncology. 2019.
40. Han MA, Kim KS, Park J, Kang MG, Ryu SY. Association between levels of physical activity and poor self-rated health in Korean adults: The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2005. Public health. 2009;123(10):665–9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.08.005 19854457
41. Sodergren M, Sundquist J, Johansson SE, Sundquist K. Physical activity, exercise and self-rated health: a population-based study from Sweden. BMC public health. 2008;8:352. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-352 18840294
42. Abu-Omar K, Rutten A, Robine JM. Self-rated health and physical activity in the European Union. Sozial- und Praventivmedizin. 2004;49(4):235–42. doi: 10.1007/s00038-004-3107-x 15357524
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis