Nutrigenomic effect of conjugated linoleic acid on growth and meat quality indices of growing rabbit
Authors:
A. M. Abdelatty aff001; Shereen A. Mohamed aff002; Mahmoud M. A. Moustafa aff002; Asmaa K. Al-Mokaddem aff003; M. R. Baker aff004; Ahmed A. Elolimy aff005; Shawky A. Elmedany aff006; Shaymaa Hussein aff007; Omar A. A. Farid aff008; Osama G. Sakr aff009; Mohamed A. Elhady aff010; Massimo Bionaz aff011
Authors place of work:
Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
aff001; Department of Genetics and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Qalyubia, Egypt
aff002; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza,Egypt
aff003; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
aff004; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, United States of America
aff005; Regional Center for Food and Feed, Agriculture Research Center; Giza, Egypt
aff006; Department of Cytology and Histology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
aff007; Department of Physiology, National Organization for Drug Control and Research, Giza, Egypt
aff008; Animal Production Department (Poultry Physiology), Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
aff009; Department of Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
aff010; Department of Animal and Rangeland sciences, Oregon State University, Oregon, United States of America
aff011
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222404
Summary
Conjugated linoleic acid was detected in rabbit caecotrophs, due to the presence of microbial lipid activity in rabbit cecum. However, the effect of CLA as a functional food in growing rabbit is not well established. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of CLA on production, meat quality, and its nutrigenomic effect on edible parts of rabbit carcass including skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue. Therefore, seventy five weaned V-Line male rabbits, 30 days old, were randomly allocated into three dietary treatments receiving either basal control diet, diet supplemented with 0.5% (CLAL), or 1% CLA (CLAH). Total experimental period (63 d) was segmented into 7 days adaptation and 56 days experimental period. Dietary supplementation of CLA did not alter growth performance, however, the fat percentage of longissimus lumborum muscle was decreased, with an increase in protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) percentage. Saturated fatty acids (SFA) and mono unsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) were not increased in CLA treated groups. There was tissue specific sensing of CLA, since subcutaneous adipose tissue gene expression of PPARA was downregulated, however, CPT1A tended to be upregulated in liver of CLAL group only (P = 0.09). In skeletal muscle, FASN and PPARG were upregulated in CLAH group only (P ≤0.01). Marked cytoplasmic vacuolation was noticed in liver of CLAH group without altering hepatocyte structure. Adipocyte size was decreased in CLA fed groups, in a dose dependent manner (P <0.01). Cell proliferation determined by PCNA was lower (P <0.01) in adipose tissue of CLA groups. Our data indicate that dietary supplementation of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) at a dose of 0.5% in growing rabbit diet produce rabbit meat rich in PUFA and lower fat % without altering growth performance and hepatocyte structure.
Keywords:
fatty acids – Diet – Meat – Fats – Skeletal muscles – Rabbits – Adipose tissue – Oleic acid
Introduction
In ruminants, the effect of microbial fermentation on dietary long-chain fatty acids (LCFA), especially biohydrogenation of polyunsaturated LCFA (PUFA), is relatively well known. The effect of microbial fermentation on PUFA in the hindgut of small herbivores including rabbit is poorly known [1,2]. For most non-ruminant herbivores this effect is likely irrelevant, considering that no LCFA present in the hindgut is absorbed; however, the coprophagy in rabbit let the LCFA that went through the hindgut microbial fermentation to be absorbed, influencing the fatty acid profiling in the body [2,3]. This could explain the presence of traces of c9,t11-C18:2 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in rabbit meat and adipose tissue [2,4], however, CLA (c9, t11-CLA) was only detected in neutral and not the polar lipid fraction of rabbit skeletal muscle [4], therefore, supplementation of CLA in rabbit feed is needed to study its nutrigenomic properties.
In several studies, supplementation or infusion of various CLA isomers has biological effects in ruminants. In dairy cows, milk fat content was decreased when rumen protected t10,c12-C18:2 CLA was infused in the abomasum; however, infusing c9,t11-C18:2 CLA did not affect milk fat [5]. The effect is not always observed, as duodenal infusion of t10,c12-C18:2 CLA did not decrease milk fat in dairy goats [6]. In non-ruminant animals, dietary supplementation of CLA affected growth performance, fatty acid profile, and meat quality [7–9].
The CLA, especially t10,c12-CLA, is known to have positive effect on human health [10,11]. It is not fully clear the mechanism for such effect, but CLA is considered a functional food, especially for its role on expression of genes via a nutrient-gene interaction (i.e., nutrigenomics). Especially important for the response to CLA are the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) [12]. These nuclear receptors can strongly affect metabolism, especially lipid and glucose metabolism, with especially important role in muscle, liver, and adipose tissue [13–15]. Thus, the presence of traces of CLA in rabbit meat is of interest, however, the extent to which dietary suplementation of CLA to growing rabbit could affect the rabbit meat quality as a functional food, specifically affecting the transcriptome is not well known.
Based on the above, it seems reasonable to enrich rabbit meat with CLA through dietary supplementation of CLA.
Former studies manipulating the dietary supplementation of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) in growing rabbit are limited [16,17]. Evenmore, these studies did not investigate the effect of CLA at molecular level. This appears to be essential, considering the bioactivity of CLA in animal cells, especially due to its nutrigenomic property.
In order to close that gap, we aim in the present study to investigate the nutrigenomic, biological, and production effects of isomer mixture of c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA in weaned growing rabbit. We hypothesize that CLA affects meat quality and nutritional composition via affecting expression of lipid-related genes. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the dose effect of equal proportion of two commonly used CLA isomers (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12-CLA) on meat quality, production, and expression of lipid related genes in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue of weaned growing rabbit.
Materials and methods
Ethical approval
The experiment procedures for this study were approved by Cairo University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval# CU/II/F/47/17). And rabbits were euthanized according to AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) [18].
Rabbits, housing, and diet
Seventy-five weaned white male V-Line rabbits 30 days old, were weighed and used in a 63 days experiment (7 days adaptation at which all rabbits were fed basal control diet; to adapt the animals to the new cage and management) and 56 days experimental period. Rabbits were housed individually under 12 hr light and 12 hr dark at a constant temperature (32±2°C). Rabbits had free access to water via nipple system.
The diets were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirments recommended by NRC (National research council) for growing rabbits; 2500 Kcal digestible energy/ Kg diet, 16% crude protein, fat 2%, and crude fiber 10–12% [19] (Table 1). Rabbits were blocked for body weight (612.8 ± 24.89 g) and completely randomized into three (n = 25/group) isonitrogenous, isocaloric dietary treatments: 1) CON group was fed a basal control diet supplemented with 1% oleic acid (Techno Pharmachem, India), 2) CLAL group was fed a diet supplemented with 0.5% isomer-mix CLA (Lutrell Pure; BASF, Ludwigshafen,Germany; certified to contain equal proportion of c9,t11- and t10,c12-CLA; EFSA, [20, 21] plus 0.5% oleic acid, and 3) CLAH group was fed a diet supplemented with 1% isomer-mix CLA. Oleic acid was added to CON and CLAL diets to have final added lipid source of 1% according to a prior study [22]. All rabbits were fed basal control diet during the first week of the experiment followed by the CLAL and CLAH treated diets.
Based on our search we could not find a study on nutrigenomic effect of CLA on rabbits. Additionally, the few studies investigating the effect of CLA on rabbit only considered few parameters including meat fatty acids shift, meat quality, body weight. Those studies used dietary CLA at doses starting from 0.25% to 0.75% [16,17]. Effects on muscle fat and fatty acid composition were noticed at doses of 0.5% and 0.75%, respectively; therefore, we used 0.5% and 1% to induce changes on the gene level.
Feed samples were collected from each dietary treatment and analyzed (Table 2) for chemical composition according to AOAC, 2000 [23].
Growth performance
All rabbits were individually weighed on weekly basis. Rabbits were individually fed, and feed intake was recorded weekly. Daily feed intake (DFI) on as-fed basis, average daily gain, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated.
Euthanasia and blood sampling
At the end of the experimental period (d56), six rabbits were selected from each group (initial body weight of rabbits selected for euthanasia were non-significantly different between groups; P > 0.1) and used for all the analyses performed in this study. Rabbits were fasted overnight and euthanized according to AVMA guide lines [18], first, rabbits were anaesthetized according to a prior report [24] by intravenous injection of Ketamine and Xylazine (10 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg; respectively), followed by exsanguination. Blood samples were collected on vacutainer plain blood collection tubes (Lab supply, Cairo) and left for 30 min at room temperature before centrifugation at 1000×g for 15 min. Serum was stored in aliquots at -20°C. Serum was analyzed for total cholesterol (TC) and HDL-lipoprotein that regulates reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) to the liver and might explain the increased lipid accumulation in the liver of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) fed rabbits. HDL cholesterol was determined by enzymatic spectrophotometry according to manufacturer’s protocol (Spinreact, S.A./S.A.U.Ctra.Santa Coloma, Sant Estevede Bas, Spain). LDL cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula: LDL = TC–HDL–(TG/5) [25].
The level of VLDL cholesterol was calculated according to the formula: VLDL = TG/5 [25,26]. Total cholesterol was determined according to the method of [27], and serum triglycerides (TG) were determined according to [28].
Cecal pH and volatile fatty acids
After euthanasia, caecum was immediately exposed and pH was measured by pH probe (pH600, Milwakuee, Hungary). Caecal content (2–4 g) was collected in polypropylene tube and stored at -20°C for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) according to [29]. The column was a Supelcosil C18 (5 μm particle and 80 Ao pore size) (250 x 4.6 mm), the mobile phase was 1% phosphoric acid with a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Compounds were detected at 210 nm wavelength. Chromatogram and data were captured using Agilent ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies, INC., USA).
Carcass traits, meat composition, and fatty acid profile
After evisceration, weight of head, liver, kidney, heart, spleen, and hot carcass was recorded. The carcass was then cut into two equal longitudinal portions, the left side of the carcass was segmented to record the weight of mid quarter, fore, and hind limb. The right carcass was used for sampling, Longissimus lumborum muscle was excised and stored at -20°C for meat composition and determination of fatty acids content.
Meat composition analysis was carried out according to AOAC [23] and meat fatty acid profile was determined according to AOAC [30], by using gas chromatography (Shimadzu- 2010 plus; Shimadzu Co. Japan) equipped with flame ionization detector (FID-2010 PLUS, Shimadzu, Japan). Separation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was carried out using Agilent capillary column (60m×0.25mm I.D.; Agilent, USA) coated with a BD-Wax (Agilent J&W, CA, USA) stationary phase. Injector temperature was 260°C, detector temperature was 260°C, and column temperature was 200°C. The run was 80 minutes. The individual FAME was identified by reference to the retention time of authentic FAME standard (Sigma Aldrich, USA). The relative proportion of each fatty acid in the sample was expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids measured and calculated with the GC software.
Histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry
Tissue samples
Tissue samples of liver, adipose tissue, and Longissimus lumborum muscle were collected and preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to [31].
Three slides were prepared and examined for liver, skeletal muscle, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (9 slides / rabbit; 6 rabbits per group).
Histological examination and histometry
Tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin were examined using Olympus BX43 light microscope and captured using Olympus DP27 camera linked to CellSens dimensions software (Olympus, Egypt). For liver lesions, histological scoring was done according to [32]. Briefly, for each rabbit sample, random fields (3–4 field) were evaluated for congestion and hepatocellular changes (Fatty change and intracellular edema) as follow: none = 0, zone III = 1, zone II, III = 2, Zone I, II, III (pan-acinar). Necrosis was evaluated as follow: [none = 0, single cell or focal (zone I) = 1, sub massive (bridging necrosis) = 2, bridging necrosis+ sub massive necrosis+ infarction = 3]. Total histopathological score was obtained by summation of the three scores. For histometry, three slides were prepared for each animal sample, then five microscopic fields (200X) were captured from each slide, the area (μm2) of adipocytes was determined, the mean of adipocyte size per group was then calculated and the number of adipocytes per area was also determined [33].
Immunohistochemical staining
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded adipose tissue sections were immunostained using proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) according to a prior study [34]. The PCNA-immunoreactive nuclei were counted and expressed as percentage per mm2 of tissue according to a prior report [35].
Transmission electron microscopy
Blocks of liver tissue (1-mm3) were immediately preserved in 4% cold gluteraldehyde after euthanasia and kept for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 4°C. Samples were then processed and embedded in Epon (embedding media; Sigma-Aldrich, Egypt). Semi-thin sections were stained with Toluidine blue and examined. Ultrathin sections were cut on an LKB Ultrotome III (LKB, Egypt), and photographs were taken with JEOL JEM-100CX II Electron Microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo Japan) [36].
Transcriptomic analysis
Extraction of RNA
Samples from liver, right longissimus lumborum muscle, and right supra neck fat lobe were collected, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored in -80°C till analysis. One gram of each tissue was ground to a homogenous powder using a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen [37] and used for total RNA extraction using Qiagen RNeasy mini-kits with on-column DNase digestion according to manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA was collected in 30 μL of RNase free water and stored at -80 ᴼC. The RNA concentration and purity were measured by Nano-Drop 2000C spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). The purity (absorbance ratio, A260/A280) was 2.00±0.10 for all samples. The integrity of RNA was verified on 2% agarose gel using gel electrophoresis image (Gel Doc. BioRad) according to [37].
Synthesis of cDNA template
For the cDNA synthesis, 300 ng of RNA per 20 ul reaction were used, cDNA was synthesized using SensiFast cDNA synthesis kits (Sigma Bioline, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Primer designing and quantitative PCR
To investigate the effect of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) on different lipid metabolism processes, lipogenesis and oxidation, the following target genes were selected: ACACA (Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase Alpha), encodes for a rate limiting enzyme in fatty acid synthesis [38]; CPT1A (Carnitine Palmitoyl Tranferase 1 alpha), essential for the transport of long-chain fatty acids into the mitochondria for oxidation [39]; FASN (Fatty Acid Synthase) catalyzes de novo long-chain fatty acid synthesis [40]; PPARG,transcriptional regulation of adipocyte differentiation [41]; and PPARA, nutrient sensing and regulating the rate of fatty acid lipogenesis and catabolism in response to feeding [42].
Primer pairs for selected target and reference genes are summarized in Table 3. Primer pairs not previously published were designed using Primer Express 3, as previously described [43]. Primer pairs were purchased from (Genwez, USA). Desalted lyophilized primers were reconstituted using RNase free water (Invitrogen, USA).
The cDNA was diluted 1:20 using molecular grade RNase free water (Invitrogen, USA). Quantitative PCR reaction was performed using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR master mix (2x) (Thermo Scientific, USA). The reaction was performed in 0.2 ml qPCR strip tubes with optical caps (Gunster Biotech Co., Taiwan). The reaction consisted of 12.5μL of SYBR green Master Mix, 11 μL of diluted cDNA, and 0.75 μL of each forward and reverse primer pair to reach final volume of 25μL. Each sample was performed in triplicate. A non-template control (NTC) was run to check for primer dimer and RNA contamination. The reaction was performed in AriaMx Real Time PCR (Agilent Technologies, USA) using a two steps protocol: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 Sec followed by annealing/extension at 60°C for 60 seconds. A melting curve protocol was run at the end of the PCR by heating at 95°C for 30 Sec followed by a 65°C for 30 Sec, and 95°C for 30 Sec.
Fluorescent amplification curves data were downloaded from the AriaMx PCR System and analyzed using LinReg PCR software [44]. Three reference genes were tested including ubiquitously expressed transcript (UXT), small ribosomal protein Sub unit 15 (RPS15A), and mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit protein 39 (MRPL39). The best combination of reference genes was determined using NormFinder [45]. The stability value of the combination of the two best reference genes (RPS15A and UXT) was 0.241 for adipose tissue, 0.262 for liver, and 0.168 for muscle. The normalization factor was calculated as the geometrical mean of the two best reference genes and final data of target genes were obtained by dividing the RTqPCR values obtained by LinRegPCR to the normalization factor.
Statistical analysis
Data outliers were checked using Proc Reg of SAS (v9.4). Data with studentized t >2.5 were removed. Data were statistically analyzed using GLM procedures of SAS (v9.4) with orthogonal contrasts to obtain linear and quadratic effects with treatment as main effect. For histopathological score data, an ANOVA non-parametric approach with Proc Npar1way of SAS was used. If an overall significance of the Cui-Square was detected a pair comparison test was performed. Statistical significance was declared with a P ≤0.05 and tendency when P >0.05 but P ≤0.10.
Results
Growth performance
Growth performance parameters are presented in Table 4. Dietary CLA supplementation did not affect growth performance.
Biochemical parameters
Serum lipid profile is summarized in Table 5. There was a dose dependent increase (P < 0.01) in TC (CLAL, 9.5%; CLAH, 16.7%). However, triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol were equally increased only in CLAH group by >15%. The addition of CLA increased HDL cholesterol (CLAL, 19.0%; CLAH, 21.1%) but did not affect LDL cholesterol.
Caecum pH and Volatile fatty acids
The caecal major volatile fatty acids concentration and pH value are summarized in Table 6. Dietary CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) tended to decrease Acetate (P = 0.1) and butyrate (P = 0.11) in CLAH group by 20.41 and 25.1 percentage, respectively. However, caecal pH was significantly (P <0.01) decreased by -8.8% in CLAH group compared to the other groups.
Carcass traits, meat composition and Fatty acids profile
The effect of dietary CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) on carcass characteristics and organs weight is summarized in Table 7. The liver weight was significantly increased (P = 0.01) in CLAH group compared to the other groups. Dietary CLA did not affect dressing % and different carcass cuts.
Meat composition and fatty acid profile of Longissimus lumborum muscle is shown in Table 8. Compared to control, the protein content of the Longissimus lumborum muscle increased by 5.1% and 10.3% (P = 0.01) in CLAL and CLAH groups, respectively. The fat composition decreased by almost the same percentage (-7.3 and—15.6%) in CLAL and CLAH groups, respectively.
Supplementing rabbit diet with CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) decreased the proportion of C16:0 and C18:1n9 in CLAL and CLAH while increased the proportion of C18:2n6 in a dose dependent manner (P < 0.01). Moreover, proportion of the C18:3n6 was increased (P < 0.01) by CLAH but not by CLAL. Proportion of total saturated fatty acids and mono-unsaturated fatty acids was negatively affected by CLA while % of PUFA was increased in a dose dependent manner by CLA (P < 0.01).
Histopathological findings
Histological examination
Histological examination of liver sections of rabbit from CON group revealed normal architecture of hepatic parenchyma Fig 1A. Liver sections from rabbit receiving CLA presented vacuolation of the hepatocytes cytoplasm (Fig 1B and 1C). The vacuolation was mild in CLAL (Fig 1B) but marked in CLAH (Fig 1C). Histological score of liver lesions is presented in Table 9. Total hepatic lesion of CLAH group was significantly higher than that of CON group (P ≤ 0.01).
Adipose tissue of all groups revealed mature monolocular adipocytes with fine connective tissue septa, in-between that housed small blood capillaries Fig 2. Administration of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) resulted in significant decrease (P ≤ 0.05) in adipocyte size with increase (P ≤0.05) in the number of cells per unit area (Table 10).
Immunohistochemistry
As shown in Table 10 and Fig 3, the percentage of PCNA positive nuclei was significantly lower (P ≤0.05) in adipose tissue of CLAL and CLAH fed rabbits in a dose dependent manner (10.1 9.6% and 6.3 5.6%, respectively) when compared to control group receiving basal diet (17.3%), indicating the ability of CLA to decrease proliferation rate of the adipocytes.
Transmission electron microscopy Findings
As shown in transmission electron microscopy findings in Fig 4, Hepatocytes of all groups have shown normal hepatocyte structure, however, only hepatocytes of CLAH group exhibited large sized numerous cytoplasmic vacuoles while CLAL group showed few medium sized vacuoles, supporting the light microscopic findings.
Histological examination of Longissimus lumborum muscle revealed normal structure and arrangement of muscle bundles in all experimental groups (Fig 5), intact muscle bundles were arranged parallel to each other’s with elongated nuclei scattered peripherally under their sarcolemmal cover and visible cross striations.
Liver, Muscle, and adipose gene expression
The effect of dietary CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) on the expression of genes regulating lipid metabolism in liver, Longissimus lumborum muscle, and subcutaneous adipose tissue is presented in Fig 6. Dietary supplementation of CLA in growing rabbit diets at 0.5% and 1% induced tissue specific changes in some major key genes involved in regulation of lipid metabolism. In adipose tissue, the dietary CLA supplementation downregulated the expression of PPARA in a dose dependent manner (P <0.01). There was a tendency for a linear effect of the dose of CLA to increase the expression of PPARG (P = 0.16).
In liver there was a numerical increase in transcription of FASN (P = 0.14) in CLAH group, and a numerical increase in expression of CPT1A by CLAL (P = 0.19). The effect of CLA on skeletal muscle gene expression was more prominent than liver due to an upregulation of ACACA, FASN, and PPARG by CLAH (P ≤ 0.05) compared to CON group.
Discussion
Enriching rabbit meat with CLA can render rabbit meat a functional food for human consumption. However, the biological mechanism underlining the growth and meat quality modulation by CLA is not well studied in rabbit. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of two doses (0.5 and 1%) of CLA isomer mix (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) on growth performance, meat composition, and expression of lipid related genes in liver, skeletal muscle, and subcutaneous fat which are major metabolic organs and edible carcass parts of growing rabbits.
Dietary supplementation of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) in growing rabbit diet did not alter growth performance parameters, which is similar to findings in a former study [46] on growing rabbit. However, the treatments tended to affect the fermentation in the hindgut, with significant decrease in pH, which likely has partly driven the numerical decrease levels of acetate and butyrate but did not affect propionate, these volatile fatty acids are the major end products of hind gut microbial fermentation [47], indicating an effect of CLA on gut microbiome. In a former study on mice, CLA was found to affect gut microbiota [48]. Therefore, our data are indicative of an effect of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) on microbiota, which warrant further studies.
Supplementation of CLA (c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA) increased total cholesterol that was driven by increase in HDL cholesterol in apparently healthy rabbits. These findings are in line with findings from [49–51]. On the other side, the dose dependent increase in TC in this study is in line with [52] and contrary to [16]; however, in their study[16], they supplied sunflower oil in the control diet. Although dietary supplementation of sunflower oil increased c9,t11-CLA in milk of dairy cow [53], that might indicate a confounding effect of using sunflower oil in the control diets in CLA studies.
In rodents, the response of plasma HDL to CLA is isomer specific, and is also not consistent, with reported increase in t10,c12-CLA fed rats [54] or no effect, in mice fed either c9,t11-CLA or t10,c12-CLA [55] on HDL cholesterol; however, in both studies serum triglycerides was decreased by both c9,t11-CLA or t10,c12-CLA. More similar to rodents, in our study HDL cholesterol was positively associated with CLA. Higher HDL cholesterol is associated in human with lower risk of atherosclerosis [56], it also did not increase the TC/HDL ratio similar to the control group, indicating the atherosclerosis protecting effect of CLA similar to [57]; however, high triglycerides is associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis [58]. In our study, CLA increased serum triglycerides. It is unclear the reason for such increase, but it could have caused the observed increase in lipid accumulation in liver. Despite, the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles in hepatocyte due to lipid accumulation without affecting the hepatocyte structure as shown in TEM images in this study, indicate that CLA at the dose of 0.5% and 1% did not negatively affect hepatocyte structure. It is possible that CLA increased the cholesterol reverse transport by stimulating HDL production in the liver [59], indicating that CLA might stimulate the liver to produce more HDL when total cholesterol increases.
The effect of CLA on hepatocytes is multifactorial as previously observed in mice [60]. In the current study, the increased proportions of liver weight might be due to increase fat accumulation, as indicated by the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles in hepatocytes in CLA supplemented rabbits [61]. The increase in the proportion of liver weight might be due to isomer specific action of t10,c12-CLA. An increase in liver weight was detected at a dose of 2% and 3% in hamsters [62]. The higher fat content in the liver in this study might be due to muliple factors including reduction of fatty acid oxidation rate in CLAH group due to decreased CPT1A. In addition to a numerical upregulation of FASN in CLAH, coding for a key de-novo fatty acid synthesis enzyme. Our data are similar to a prior study wherease, non-significant increase in hepatic FASN when 1.5% CLA was dietary supplemented to lactating mice [63]. Despite the fact that PPARA is more abundant with critical functions in liver than adipose tissue [64], recent studies revealed important functions of this genes in adipose tissue of rodents [65,66]. The latter studies might help to explain the effect of CLA on transcription of PPARA in adipose tissue rather than liver in the current study. Dietary CLA (c9,t11 and t10,c12- CLA) supplementation downregulated the expression of PPARA in sub-cutaneous adipose tissue in our study, similar to a prior study in mice [63]. Lower transcription of PPARA might be associated with lower lipid oxidation but also lower adipogenesis [66]. The decreased expression of PCNA positive cells indicating the ability of CLA to limit adipocytes proliferation was reported in a prior study [33], this reduction in proliferation rate could be attributed to the downregulation of FASN. Association between expression/function of FASN with adipocyte proliferation was reported in mice pre-adipocytes in vitro [67, 68].
In this study, there was a noticeable nutrigenomic effect of CLA on skeletal muscle besides an effect on composition and fatty acid profile. The increased level of PUFA (especially, C18:2n6 and C18:3n6) on the expense of MUFA and SFA by feeding CLA is consistent to prior studies [69,70] including rabbit [46]. The higher proportion of PUFA might be explained by the effect of CLA on steroyl CoA desaturase (SCD) gene expression that was increased in longissimus thoracic muscle of finishing pig [71]; however, expression of SCD5 was not measured in the current study. In addition, dietary supplementation of CLA at a dose of 1% (CLAH) markedly upregulated skeletal muscle gene expression of lipid-synthesis associated genes, such as FASN and PPARG similar to prior studies [72,73]. Based on a prior study in beef steers [74], increase in expression of those two genes is associated with increased marbling. However, in our study the fat content in muscle was the lowest with CLAH as well as the fatty acid derived from de novo synthesis (C14:0 and a proportion of C16:0). Thus, the data appears contradictory and unexplained. It is possible that CLA affected muscle fat via effect on other genes or proteins, such as AMP-activated protein kinase, controlling lipolysis, and PPARδ [75–77]. In this context, the isomer specific action of CLA was reported by [78], they find that AMPK phosphorylation was increased by t10,c12 CLA and not c9,t11CLA.
The effect of different CLA isomers on crosstalk between liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue in terms of regulation of lipid metabolism is not well understood, from our findings it seems that the effect of c9,t11-CLA or t10,c12- CLA on liver, sleletal muscle, and adipose tissue is not regulated through PPARA, similar to our findings is [79]. The Further investigations of different signalling pathways to undestand the regulatory effect of CLA on lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle-adipose tissue axis including AMPK, mTOR, and Glucocorticoid receptors need to be addressed.
Conclusion
In this study we hypothesize that dietary supplementation of CLA mixture of c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12-CLA isomers in growing rabbit would improve rabbit meat quality via controlling expression of lipid-related genes without altering growth performance. Our findings confirmed that CLA mixture of c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12-CLA improved meat quality through increasing protein content and PUFA through a nutrigenomic action on lipogenic gene expression in skeletal muscle. The effect was present to a lesser extent in the liver with increased lipid accumulation without altering hepatocyte structure and with minimal effect on expression of measured genes. From our findings, dietary supplementation of CLA mixture of c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12-CLA to growing rabbit seems to have a tissue specific nutrient-gene interaction (muscle > adipose > liver), which needs further investigation by supplementing each isomer individually, and study its effects on genes regulating protein synthesis.
Zdroje
1. Carabaño R, Piquer J, Menoyo D, Badiola I. The digestive system of the rabbit. Nutrition of the Rabbit. 2010; 1–18.
2. Leiber F, Meier JS, Burger B, Wettstein HR, Kreuzer M, Hatt JM, et al. Significance of coprophagy for the fatty acid profile in body tissues of rabbits fed different diets. Lipids. 2008; 43(9):853–865.
3. Betancourt López CA, Bernal Santos MG, Vázquez Landaverde PA, Bauman DE, Harvatine KJ, Srigley CT, et al. Both Dietary Fatty Acids and Those Present in the Cecotrophs Contribute to the Distinctive Chemical Characteristics of New Zealand Rabbit Milk Fat. Lipids. 2018; 53(11–12):1085–1096. doi: 10.1002/lipd.12127 30739314
4. Gómez-Conde MS, Menoyo D, Chamorro S, Bote CL, Rebollar PG, De Blas JC. Conjugated linoleic acid content in cecotrophes, suprarenal and intramuscular fat in rabbit fed commercial diets. World Rabbit Science.2010; 14(2): 95–99.
5. Baumgard LH, Cor BA, Dwyer DA, Saebo A, Bauman DE. Identification of the conjugated linoleic acid isomer that inhibits milk fat synthesis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000; 278: 179–184.
6. Andrade PVD, Schmidely P. Effect of duodenal infusion of trans10, cis12-CLA on milk performance and milk fatty acid profile in dairy goats fed high or low concentrate diet in combination with rolled canola seed. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2006; 46:31–48. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2005062
7. Sirri F, Tallarico N, Meluzzi A, Franchini A. Fatty acid composition and productive traits of broiler fed diets containing conjugated linoleic acid. Poult. Sct. 2003;82: 1356–1361.
8. Pastorelli G, Macchioni MVM, Fiego PLO, Santoro DP, Panseri P, Rossi S, et al. Influence of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the fatty acid composition and volatile compounds profile of heavy pig loin muscle. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005; 85: 2227–2234. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5638
9. Koronowicz AA, Banks P, Szymczyk B, Master LA, Piasna E, Szczepański WD. et al. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid affects blood parameters, liver morphology and expression of selected hepatic genes in laying hens. British Poultry Science.2016; 57(5): 663–673 doi: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1192280 27267260
10. Bauman DE, Baumgard LH, Corl BA, Griinari DJ. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid in ruminants. In Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 1999; 77: 1–14.
11. McGuire MA. McGuire MK. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA): A ruminant fatty acid with beneficial effects on human health. Journal of Animal Science, 77(E-Suppl), 1–8. and fatty acid oxidation in adipocytes. Journal of lipid research.2000;52(5):873–884.
12. Bionaz M, Baumrucker CR, Shirk E, Heuvel JV, Block E, Varga GA. Characterization of Madin-Darby bovine kidney cell line for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Temporal response and sensitivity to fatty acids. Journal of Dairy Science.2008; 91(7):2808–2813. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0789 18565938
13. Lehnen TE, da Silva MR, Camacho A, Marcadenti A, Lehnen AMA. review on effects of conjugated linoleic fatty acid (CLA) upon body composition and energetic metabolism. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition.2015; 12(1):12–36.
14. Phua W, Wong M, Liao Z, Tan N. An aPPARent Functional Consequence in Skeletal Muscle Physiology via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018; 19(5): 1425. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051425 29747466
15. Corrales P, Izquierdo-Lahuerta A, Medina-Gómez G. Maintenance of kidney metabolic homeostasis by PPAR gamma. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018; 19(7):2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072063
16. Corino C, Mourot J, Magni S, Pastorelli G, Rosi F. Influence of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on growth, meat quality, lipogenesis, plasma leptin and physiological variables of lipid metabolism in rabbits. Journal of Animal Science. 2002; 80(4):1020–1028.
17. Marounek M, Skrivanova V, Dokoupilova A, Czauderna M, Berladyn A. Meat quality and tissue fatty acid profiles in rabbits fed diets supplemented with conjugated linoleic acid. Veterinarni Medicina. 2007; 52(12):552–561.
18. AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2000 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. J. Am. Vet. Med.Assoc. 2001;218:669–696.
19. NRC. 1977. Nutritional requirements of rabbits (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. EFSA. Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Safety and efficacy of methylester of conjugated linoleic acid (t10,c12 isomer) for pigs for fattening, sows and cows. EFSA Journal 2016;14(1):4348, 65 pp. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4348
21. Oliveira RC, Pralle RS, de Resende LC, Nova CHP, Caprarulo V, Jendza JA. et al. Prepartum supplementation of conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) increased milk energy output and decreased serum fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate in early lactation dairy cows. PloS one.2018; 13(5): e0197733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197733
22. Lambert EV, Goedecke JH, Bluett K, Heggie K, Claassen A, Rae DE, … et al. Conjugated linoleic acid versus high-oleic acid sunflower oil: effectson energy metabolism, glucose tolerance, blood lipids, appetiteand body composition in regularly exercising individuals. British Journal of Nutrition.2007;97:1001–1011. doi: 10.1079/S0007114507172822
23. AOAC. 2000 Official methods of analysis. 17th ed., Vols. 1 and 2. Gaithersburg, MD: Association of the Official Analytical Chemists.
24. Flecknell P, Lofgren JL, Dyson MC, Marini RR, Swindle MM, Wilson RP. Preanesthesia, anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia. In Laboratory Animal Medicine. 2015; 1135–1200. Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409527-4.00024–9
25. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical chemistry. 1972; 18(6): 499–502. 4337382
26. Norbert WT. Clinical guide to laboratory tests. 3 rd ed. Philadilphia.W. B. Saunders Company. 1995.
27. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CS, Richmond WFC, Fu PC. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clinical chemistry.1974; 20 (4): 470–475. 4818200
28. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER. Tietz Textbook of ClinicalChemistry, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA. 1999.
29. Niven SJ, Beal JD, Brooks PH. The simultaneous determination of short chain fatty acid, monosaccharides and ethanol in fermented liquid pig diets. Animal feed science and technology. 2004; 117(3–4):339–345.
30. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed., international, Gaithersburg, USA AOAC. 2012.
31. Bancroft JD, Gamble M. (Eds.). Theory and practice of histological techniques. 2008; Elsevier Health Sciences.
32. Yilmaz S, Ates E, Tokyol C., Pehlivan T, Erkasap S, Koken T. The protective effect of erythropoietin on ischaemia/reperfusion injury of liver. HPB. 2004; 6(3):169–173.
33. Corino C, Di Giancamillo A, Rossi R, Domeneghini C. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid affects morphofunctional and chemical aspects of subcutaneous adipose tissue in heavy pigs. The Journal of nutrition. 2005; 135(6):1444–1450. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1444 15930450
34. Hall PA, Levison DA, Woods AL, Yu CCW, Kellock DB, Watkins JA, Barnes DM, et al. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunolocalization in paraffin sections: An index of cell proliferation with evidence of deregulated expression in some, neoplasms. J Pathol. 1990; 162(4):285–94.
35. Bologna‐Molina R, Damián‐Matsumura P, Molina‐Frechero N. An easy cell counting method for immunohistochemistry that does not use an image analysis program. Histopathology. 2011; 59(4): 801–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03954.x 21939456
36. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1982; 2: 20–41
37. Norollahi SA, Kokhaee P, Rashidy-Pour A, Hojati V, Norollahi SE, Larijani LV, et al. Comparison of Methods of RNA Extraction From Breast and Gastric Cancer Tissues. Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences. 2018; 5(1):25–28.
38. Wakil SJ, Abu-Elheiga LA. Fatty acid metabolism: target for metabolic syndrome. Journal of lipid research. 2009. 50 138–143. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800079-JLR200 19047759
39. Warfel JD, Vandanmagsar B, Dubuisson OS, Hodgeson SM, Elks CM, Ravussin E, et al. Examination of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 abundance in white adipose tissue: implications in obesity research. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2017; 312(5):R816–R820.
40. Lupu R, & Menendez J. Pharmacological Inhibitors of Fatty Acid Synthase (FASN)-Catalyzed Endogenous Fatty Acid Biogenesis: A New Family of Anti-Cancer Agents? Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2006; 7(6), 483–494. doi: 10.2174/138920106779116928 17168665
41. Perera RJ, Marcusson EG, Koo S, Kang X, Kim Y, White N, et al. Identification of novel PPARg target genes in primary human adipocytes.Gene. 2006; 369:90–99
42. Xu J, Xiao G, Trujillo C, Chang V, Blanco L, Joseph S. et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) influences substrate utilization for hepatic glucose production. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002; 277(52): 50237–50244. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201208200
43. Bionaz M, Chen S, Khan MJ, Loor JJ. Functional role of PPARs in ruminants: Potential targets for fine-tuning metabolism during growth and lactation. PPAR research.2013; ID 684159, 28 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/684159.
44. Ruijter JM, Ramakers C, Hoogaars WM, Karlen Y, Bakker O, van den Hoff MJ, et al. Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Nucleic acids research. 2009; 37(6): e45 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp045 19237396
45. Andersen CL, Ledet-Jensen J, Ørntoft T. Normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data: a model based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization—applied to bladder- and colon-cancer data-sets. Cancer Research. 2004; (64): 5245–5250.
46. Marounek M, Skrivanova V, Dokoupilova A, Czauderna M, Berladyn A. Meat quality and tissue fatty acid profiles in rabbits fed diets supplemented with conjugated linoleic acid. Veterinarni Medicina. 2007; 52(12):552–561.
47. Remely M, Aumueller E, Merold C, Dworzak S, Hippe B, Zanner J, et al. Effects of short chain fatty acid producing bacteria on epigenetic regulation of FFAR3 in type 2 diabetes and obesity. Gene. 2014; 537(1): 85–92.
48. Chaplin A, Parra P, Serra F, Palou A. Conjugated Linoleic Acid Supplementation under a High-Fat Diet Modulates Stomach Protein Expression and Intestinal Microbiota in Adult Mice. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(4): e0125091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125091 25915857
49. Corino C, Fiego DL, Macchioni P, Pastorelli G, DiGiancamillo A, Domeneghini C, et al. Influence of dietary conjugated linoleic acids and vitamin E on meat quality, and adipose tissue in rabbits. Meat Science. 2007; 76(1): 19–28.
50. Du M, Ahn DU. Dietary CLA affects lipid metabolism in broiler chicks. Lipids. 2003; 38(5): 505–511.
51. Chai BK, Lau YS, Loong BJ, Rais MM, Ting KN, Dharmani DM, et al. Co-administration of conjugated linoleic acid and rosiglitazone increases atherogenic co-efficient and alters isoprenaline-induced vasodilatation in rats fed high fat diet. Physiological research. 2018; 67(5):729–740.
52. Kritchevsky D, Tepper SA, Wright S, Tso P, Czarnecki SK. Influence of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on establishment and progression of atherosclerosis in rabbits. Journal of American College Nutr. 2000; 19(4):4725–4775.
53. AbuGhazaleh AA, Holmes LD. Diet supplementation with fish oil and sunflower oil to increase conjugated linoleic acid levels in milk fat of partially grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007; 90(6): 2897–2904. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-684 17517729
54. Maslak E, Buczek E, Szumny A, Szczepnski W, Franczyk-Zarow M, Kopec A, et al. Individual CLA isomers, c9t11 and t10c12, prevent excess liver glycogen storage and inhibit lipogenic genes expression induced by high-fructose diet in rats. BioMed research international. 2015. ID 535982, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/535982
55. Kanter J, Goodspeed L, Wang S, Kramer F, Wietecha T, Gomes-Kjerulf D, et al. 10, 12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid-Driven Weight Loss Is Protective against Atherosclerosis in Mice and Is Associated with Alternative Macrophage Enrichment in Perivascular Adipose Tissue. Nutrients. 2018; 10(10):1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101416.
56. Bandeali S, Farmer J. High-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis: the role of antioxidant activity. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2012; 14(2):101–107.
57. Lee KN, Kritchevsky D, Pariza MW. Conjugated linoleic acid and ather6osclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis. 1994;108(1): 19–25.
58. Talayero BG, Sacks FM. The role of triglycerides in atherosclerosis. Current cardiology reports. 2011; 13(6):544–552. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0220-3 21968696
59. Fielding CJ, Fielding PE. Molecular physiology of reverse cholesterol transport. Journal of lipid research. 1995; 36(2):211–228.
60. Vyas D, Kadegowda AK, Erdman RA. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid and hepatic steatosis: species-specific effects on liver and adipose lipid metabolism and gene expression. J. Nutr. Metab.2012.ID 932928, 13 pages doi: 10.1155/2012/932928 21869929
61. Brunt EM. Pathology of fatty liver disease. Modern Pathology. 2007; 20:S40–48. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800680 17486051
62. Liu X, Joseph SV, Wakefield AP, Aukema HM, Jones PJH. High Dose trans-10, cis-12 CLA Increases Lean Body Mass in Hamsters, but levates Levels of Plasma Lipids and Liver Enzyme Biomarkers. Lipids. 2012; 47:39–46. doi: 10.1007/s11745-011-3616-3 22038709
63. Kun P, Liqiang H. Effect of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Metabolism and Lipogenic Gene Expression of Liver in Lactating Mice. In 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME) 2016; 137–139.
64. Montagner A, Polizzi A, Fouché E, Ducheix S, Lippi Y, Lasserre F, et al. Liver PPARα is crucial for whole-body fatty acid homeostasis and is protective against NAFLD. Gut, 2016; 65(7): 1202–1214. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310798 26838599
65. Guzmán M, Verme JL, Fu J, Oveisi F, Blázquez C, Piomelli D. Oleoylethanolamide stimulates lipolysis by activating the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPAR-α). Journal of biological chemistry. 2004; 279(27): 27849–27854. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404087200 15123613
66. Goto T, Lee JY, Teraminami A, Kim YI, Hirai S, Uemura T, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha stimulates both differentiation and fatty acid oxidation in adipocytes. Journal of lipid research. 2011; 52(5):873–884.
67. Student AK, Hsu RY, Lane MD. Induction of fatty acid synthetase synthesis in differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1980; 255(10): 4745–4750.
68. Vu D, Ong JM, Clemens TL, Kern PA. 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D induces lipoprotein lipase expression in 3T3-L1 cells in association with adipocyte differentiation. Endocrinology. 1996; 137(5):1540–1544.
69. Kennedy SR, Campbell PJ, Porter A, Tocher DR. Influence of dietaryconjugatedlinoleicacid (CLA) on lipid and fatty acid composition in liver and muscle of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).Comp. Biochem. Phys. B. 2005; 141:168–178.
70. Carta G, Murru E, Manca C, Abolghasemi A, Serra A, Mele M, et al. Natural conjugated linoleic acid enriched lamb meat fat modifies tissue fatty acid profile and increases n-3 HUFA score in obese Zucker rats. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2018; 77 (OCE2), E29. Spring Conference 2018, Nutrient-nutrient interaction. doi: 10.1017/S002966511800023X
71. Tous N, Theil PK, Lauridsen C, Lizardo R, Vila B, Esteve-Garcia E. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid modify gene expression in liver, muscles, and fat tissues of finishing pigs. Journal of animal science. 2012; 90(4):340–342.
72. Meadus WJ, MacInnis R, Dugan ME. Prolonged dietary treatment with conjugated linoleic acid stimulates porcine muscle peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma and glutamine-fructose aminotransferase gene expression in vivo. Journal of molecular endocrinology. 2002; 28(2): 79–86.
73. Cho K, Song Y, Kwon D. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation enhances insulin sensitivity and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and glucose transporter type 4 protein expression in the skeletal muscles of rats during endurance exercise. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 2016; 19(1): 20–27. 27096060
74. Moyes KM, Graugnard DE, Khan MJ. Mukesh Loor MJJ. Postpartal immunometabolic gene network expression and function in blood neutrophils are altered in response to prepartal energy intake and postpartal intramammary inflammatory challenge. J. Dairy Sci. 2014; 97:2165–2177.
75. Mohankumar SK, Taylor CG, Siemens L, Zahradka P. Activation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, AMP-activated kinase and Akt substrate-160 kDa by trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid mediates skeletal muscle glucose uptake. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2013; 24(2): 445–456. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.01.006 22704782
76. Kim JH, Kim J, Park Y. Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid enhances endurance capacity by increasing fatty acid oxidation and reducing glycogen utilization in mice. Lipids. 2012; 47(9): 855–863.
77. Qin H, Liu Y, Lu N, Li Y, Sun CH. Cis-9, trans-11-Conjugated linoleic acid activates AMP-activated protein kinase in attenuation of insulin resistance in C2C12 myotubes. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2009; 57(10):4452–4458. doi: 10.1021/jf900534w 19364109
78. Kim Y, Park Y. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis signaling by the upregulation of PPARγ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) in C2C12 cells. Lipids. 2015; 50(4):329–338.
79. Jeffrey MP, Yeonhwa P, Frank JG, Michael WP. Infuence of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition and target gene expression in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor K-null mice. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2001; (1533): 233–242
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis