Exposure to marital conflict: Gender differences in internalizing and externalizing problems among children

English version

Autoři: Rikuya Hosokawa ^aff001; Toshiki Katsura ^aff002
Působiště autorů: School of Nursing, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan ^aff001; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan ^aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222021

Souhrn

Purpose

Marital conflict is integral to children’s psychosocial well-being. Extant research has shown that the effects of marital conflict on children are likely to vary by gender, indicating that gender plays a significant and complex role in the relationship between marital conflict and child adjustment. Focusing on gender, this study investigates the link between specific marital conflict tactics and children’s mental health symptoms in families in which the parents live together.

Methods

This study gathered data from 799 children and their parents in Japan by means of a questionnaire focusing on marital conflict and child behavioral problems. Marital conflict (verbal aggression, physical aggression, stonewalling, avoidance-capitulation, child involvement, and cooperation) was assessed using a Conflict and Problem-Solving Scale. Children’s behavioral problems (externalizing and internalizing symptoms) were assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

Results

The findings highlight the significant impact of specific interparental conflict on children’s behavioral problems, demonstrating that there are differences according to the child’s gender. More specifically, multivariate analyses targeting boys revealed that cooperation was significantly inversely associated with externalizing problems and internalizing problems, while avoidance-capitulation and verbal aggression were significantly positively associated with externalizing problems. In contrast, multivariate analyses targeting girls revealed that cooperation was significantly inversely associated with externalizing problems and internalizing problems, while avoidance-capitulation and stonewalling were significantly positively associated with internalizing problems.

Conclusion

This study reveals that interparental conflict is associated with children’s behavioral problems. Constructive marital conflict was significantly inversely associated with externalizing and internalizing problems in both boys and girls. Meanwhile, destructive marital conflict (i.e., avoidance-capitulation and verbal aggression) was significantly positively associated with externalizing problems in boys and significantly positively associated with internalizing problems in girls. These findings contribute to the substantial literature demonstrating the relationship between family processes and the development of disruptive behavior disorders in children.

Klíčová slova:

Biology and life sciences – Research and analysis methods – Psychology – Social sciences – Sociology – People and places – Population groupings – Medicine and health sciences – Research design – Behavior – Education – Schools – Survey research – Age groups – Children – Families – Mental health and psychiatry – Emotions – Educational attainment – Questionnaires – Aggression

Zdroje

1. Cummings EM, Davies D. Children and marital conflict: The impact of family dispute and resolution. New York: Guilford; 1994.

2. Zemp M, Bodenmann G, Cummings EM. The significance of interparental conflict for children: Rationale for couple-focused programs in family therapy. Eur Psychol. 2016;21: 99–108.

3. Cummings EM, Davies P, Simpson K. Marital conflict, gender, and children’s appraisals and coping efficacy as mediators of child adjustment. J Fam Psychol. 1994;8; 141–149.

4. Harold G, Conger R. Marital conflict and adolescent distress: The role of adolescent awareness. Child Dev. 1997;68: 333–350. 9180005

5. Cummings EM, Goeke-Morey M, Papp L. Children’s responses to everyday marital conflict tactics in the home. Child Dev. 2003;74: 1918–1929. 14669904

6. Davies PT, Cummings EM. Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1994;116: 387–411. 7809306

7. Goeke-Morey MC, Cummings EM, Harold GT, Shelton KH. Categories and continua of destructive and constructive marital conflict tactics from the perspective of U.S. and Welsh children. J Fam Psychol. 2003;17: 327–338. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.327 14562457

8. Frosch CA, Mangelsdorf SC, McHale JL. Marital behavior and the security of preschooler-parent attachment relationships. J Fam Psychol. 2000;14: 144–161. 10740688

9. Goodman SH, Barfoot B, Frye AA, Belli AM. Dimensions of marital conflict and children’s social problem-solving skills. J Fam Psychol. 1999;13: 33–45. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.13.1.33

10. McCoy K, Cummings EM, Davies PT. Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security, and children’s prosocial behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50: 270–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01945.x 18673403

11. Gonzales NA, Pitts SC, Hill NE, Roosa MW. A meditational model of the impact of interparental conflict on child adjustment in a multiethnic, low-income sample. J Fam Psychol. 2000;14: 365–379. 11025930

12. Davies PT, Cummings EM. Exploring children’s emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital relations and child adjustment. Child Dev. 1998;69: 124–139. 9499562

13. Nicoletti L, El-Sheikh M, Whitson SM. Children’s coping with marital conflict and their adjustment and physical health: Vulnerability and protective functions. J Fam Psychol. 2003;17: 315–326. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.315 14562456

14. Grych JH, Fincham FD. Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework. Psychol Bull. 1990;108: 267–290. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.267 2236384

15. Jenkins JM, Smith MA. Factors protecting children living in disharmonious homes: Maternal reports. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990;29: 60–69. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199001000-00011 2295580

16. Katz LF, Low SM. Marital violence, co-parenting and family-level processes in relation to children’s adjustment. J Fam Psychol. 2004;18: 372–382. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.372 15222844

17. McCoy KP, George MRW, Cummings EM, Davies PT. Constructive and destructive marital conflict, parenting, and children's school and social adjustment. Social Development 2013;22(4): 641–662.

18. Cox MJ, Paley B. Understanding families as systems. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12: 193–196.

19. Kitzmann KM. Effects of marital conflict on subsequent triadic family interactions and parenting. Dev Psychol. 2000;36: 3–13. 10645740

20. Lindahl K, Malik N. Marital conflict, family process, and boys’ externalizing behavior in Hispanic American and European American families. J Clin Child Psychol. 1999;28: 12–24. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2801_2 10070604

21. Fincham F, Beach S. Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Ann Rev Psychol. 1999;50: 47–77.

22. Cummings EM, Davies PT. Emotional security as a regulatory process in normal development and the development of psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 1996;8: 123–139.

23. Davies PT, Forman EM. Children's patterns of preserving emotional security in the interparental subsystem. Child Dev. 2002;73: 1880–1903. 12487500

24. Kerig PK. Assessing the links between interparental conflict and child adjustment: The conflicts and problem-solving scales. J Fam Psychol. 1996;10: 454–473.

25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A. Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41(4):1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 19897823

26. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2011. Summary Report of Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions 2011. Available from: www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hss/dl/report_gaikyo_2011. pdf. Cited 25 July 2019.

27. Population Census 2010. Statistics Bureau. Available from: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/kokusei/2010/summary.htm. Cited 25 July 2019.

28. Acquadro C, Jambon B, Ellis D, Marquis P. Language and translation issues. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. pp. 575–585.

29. Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38: 581–586. 9255702

30. Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB. When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (sdq): Data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020;38: 1179–1191. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x

31. Matsuishi T, Nagano M, Araki Y, Tanaka Y, Iwasaki M, Yamashita Y, et al. Scale properties of the Japanese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A study of infant and school children in community samples. Brain Dev. 2008;30: 410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.12.003 18226867

32. Erel O, Burman B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 1995;118: 108–132. doi: 10.1037/00332909.118.1.108 7644602

33. Sturge-Apple ML, Davies PT, Cummings EM. Impact of hostility and withdrawal in interparental conflict on parental emotional unavailability and children’s adjustment difficulties. Child Dev. 2006;77: 1623–1641. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00963.x 17107450

34. Hildyard KL, Wolfe DA. Child neglect: Developmental issues and outcomes. Child Abuse Negl. 2002;26: 679–695. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00341-1 12201162

35. Toth SL, Cicchetti D, Macfie J, Emde RN. Representations of self and other in the narratives of neglected, physically abused, and sexually abused preschoolers. Dev Psychopathol. 1997;9: 781–796. doi: 10.1017/S0954579497001430 9449005

36. Bennett DS, Sullivan MW, Lewis M. Neglected children, shame-proneness, and depressive symptoms. Child Maltreat. 2010;15: 305–314. doi: 10.1177/1077559510379634 20724372

37. Bolger KE, Patterson CJ. Pathways from child maltreatment to internalizing problems: Perceptions of control as mediators and moderators. Dev Psychopathol. 2001;13: 913–940. 11771914.

38. Grych J. Children’s appraisals of interparental conflict: Situational and contextual influences. J Fam Psychol. 1998;12: 437–453. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.12.3.437

39. Dadds M, Atkinson E, Turner C, Blums G, Lendich B. Family conflict and child adjustment: Evidence for a cognitive–contextual model of intergenerational transmission. J Fam Psychol. 1999;13: 194–208. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.13.2.194

40. Davies PT, Myers RL, Cummings EM. Responses of children and adolescents to marital conflict scenarios as a function of the emotionality of conflict endings. Merrill Palmer Q. 1996;42: 1–21.

41. Bandura A. Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press; 1977.

42. Snyder JR. Marital conflict and child adjustment: What about gender? Dev Rev. 1998;18: 390–420.

43. Cummings JS, Pellegrini DS, Notarious CI, Cummings EM. Children’s responses to angry adult behavior as a function of marital distress and history of interparental hostility. Child Dev. 1989;60: 1035–1043. 2805881

44. Jenkins J, Simpson A, Dunn J, Rasbash J, O'Connor TG. Mutual influence of marital conflict and children's behavior problems: Shared and nonshared family risks. Child Dev. 2005;76: 24–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00827.x 15693755

45. Cicchetti D, Toth SL. Developmental psychopathology and disorders of affect. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ, editors. Developmental psychopathology, Vol 2: Risk, disorder, and adaptation. New York: Wiley; 1995. pp. 369–420.

46. Dishion TJ, French DC, Patterson GR. The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ, editors. Developmental psychopathology, Vol 2: Risk, disorder, and adaptation. New York: Wiley; 1995. pp. 421–471.

47. Kumagai F, Straus MA. Conflict resolution tactics in Japan, India, and the USA. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 1983;14(3):377–392.

48. Smider NA, Essex MJ, Kalin NH, Buss KA, Klein MH, Davidson RJ, et al. Salivary cortisol as a predictor of socioemotional adjustment during kindergarten: A prospective study. Child Dev. 2002;73: 75–92. 14717245