Deconstruction of central line insertion guidelines based on the positive deviance approach—Reducing gaps between guidelines and implementation: A qualitative ethnographic research

English version

Autoři: Ricky Cohen ^aff001; Anat Gesser-Edelsburg ^aff001; Arvind Singhal ^aff003; Shmuel Benenson ^aff005; Allon E. Moses ^aff005
Působiště autorů: School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel ^aff001; The Health and Risk Communication Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel ^aff002; Department of Communication, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America ^aff003; School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway ^aff004; Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel ^aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222608

Souhrn

Background

Despite a proven association between the implementation of prevention guidelines for central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) and reduction in CLABSI rates, in practice there is poor adherence. Furthermore, current guidelines fail to address the multiple process on the care continuum. This research is based on the bottom-up "Positive Deviance" (PD) approach, through which multiple creative and safer solutions for central line (CL) insertion were identified that were not previously described in the guidelines. The aim of the study was to deconstruct CLABSI prevention guidelines ("during insertion" process only) through the PD approach, working with physicians to identify additional actions that, in practice, help maintain a sterile environment and contribute to patient safety.

Methods and findings

Our study included a qualitative ethnographic study involving 76 physicians, working in a division of internal medicine and two intensive care units (ICUs). We triangulated findings from a combination of data-collection methods: semi-structured interviews, focused observations, video documentation, Discovery & Action Dialogue (DAD), and simulations. Deconstruction analysis was performed. A total of 23 creative extensions and variations of CL insertion practices were identified.

Conclusions

The PD approach enables the identification of vital nuggets of hidden wisdom missing from the formal explicit CLABSI guidelines, and therefore helps bridge the gap between theory and praxis. During the guideline's deconstruction process, through collaborative staff learning, the written procedure is transformed into a living, breathing and cooperative one. It can reduce hospital stays and save lives, and therefore needs careful attention of healthcare scholars and practitioners.

Klíčová slova:

Biology and life sciences – Bioengineering – Biotechnology – Engineering and technology – Research and analysis methods – Neuroscience – Cognitive science – Cognitive psychology – Learning – Human learning – Learning and memory – Psychology – Social sciences – People and places – Population groupings – Professions – Geographical locations – Medicine and health sciences – Health care – Health care providers – Medical doctors – Physicians – Medical personnel – Public and occupational health – Behavior – Equipment – Medical devices and equipment – Asia – Equipment preparation – Hygiene – Catheters – Israel – Equipment sterilization

Zdroje

1. Erasmus V, Daha TJ, Brug H, Richardus JH, Behrendt MD, Vos MC, et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(3):283–94. Epub 2010/01/22. doi: 10.1086/650451 20088678.

2. WHO. Guide to Implementation—A Guide to the Implementation of the WHO Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.

3. Pittet D, Boyce JM, Allegranzi B. Hand Hygiene: A Handbook for Medical Professionals. Flanders SA, Saint S, editors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2017.

4. Huis A, van Achterberg T, de Bruin M, Grol R, Schoonhoven L, Hulscher M. A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach. Implementation science: IS. 2012;7:92. Epub 2012/09/18. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-92 22978722; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3517511.

5. Zingg W, Holmes A, Dettenkofer M, Goetting T, Secci F, Clack L, et al. Hospital organisation, management, and structure for prevention of health-care-associated infection: a systematic review and expert consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(2):212–24. Epub 2014/12/04. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70854-0 25467650.

6. European Commission. A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). 2017.

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2013.

8. State Comptroller. Annual Control Report 63c for 2012 and for accounting for financial year 2011. Jerusalem: 2013.

9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: Central Line—associated blood stream infections—United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. Annals of emergency medicine. 2011;58(5):447–50. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.035 22018400

10. Ista E, van der Hoven B, Kornelisse RF, van der Starre C, Vos MC, Boersma E, et al. Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(6):724–34. Epub 2016/02/26. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00409-0 26907734.

11. Ziegler MJ, Pellegrini DC, Safdar N. Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection. 2015;43(1):29–36. Epub 2014/10/22. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0689-y 25331552.

12. Latif A, Halim MS, Pronovost PJ. Eliminating infections in the ICU: CLABSI. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015;17(7):491. Epub 2015/06/03. doi: 10.1007/s11908-015-0491-8 26031963.

13. Marschall J, Mermel LA, Fakih M, Hadaway L, Kallen A, O'Grady NP, et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(7):753–71. Epub 2014/06/11. doi: 10.1086/676533 24915204.

14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations on use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: An update to the 2011 guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion., 2017.

15. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):e162–93. Epub 2011/04/05. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257 21460264; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3106269.

16. Furuya EY, Dick AW, Herzig CT, Pogorzelska-Maziarz M, Larson EL, Stone PW. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Reduction and Bundle Compliance in Intensive Care Units: A National Study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(7):805–10. Epub 2016/04/08. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.67 27052993; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4939802.

17. Krein SL, Fowler KE, Ratz D, Meddings J, Saint S. Preventing device-associated infections in US hospitals: national surveys from 2005 to 2013. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(6):385–92. Epub 2015/04/12. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003870 25862757.

18. Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, Dudeck MA, Patel J, Kallen AJ, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011–2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(11):1288–301. Epub 2016/10/22. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.174 27573805.

19. Valencia C, Hammami N, Agodi A, Lepape A, Herrejon EP, Blot S, et al. Poor adherence to guidelines for preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI): results of a worldwide survey. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5:49. Epub 2016/11/30. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0139-y 27895904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5120566.

20. State of Israel Ministry of Health. The National Program for Quality Indicators in Israel. Acquired Infections: Report for Year 2015. 2016.

21. Ben-David D, Vaturi A, Solter E, Temkin E, Carmeli Y, Schwaber MJ, et al. The association between implementation of second-tier prevention practices and CLABSI incidence: A national survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019:1–6. Epub 2019/07/25. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.190 31339089.

22. Berenholtz SM, Lubomski LH, Weeks K, Goeschel CA, Marsteller JA, Pham JC, et al. Eliminating central line-associated bloodstream infections: a national patient safety imperative. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(1):56–62. Epub 2013/12/18. doi: 10.1086/674384 24334799.

23. Gurses AP, Seidl KL, Vaidya V, Bochicchio G, Harris AD, Hebden J, et al. Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(5):351–9. Epub 2008/10/10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021709 18842974.

24. Gesser-Edelsburg A, Cohen R, Halavi AM, Zemach M, van Heerden PV, Sviri S, et al. Beyond the hospital infection control guidelines: a qualitative study using positive deviance to characterize gray areas and to achieve efficacy and clarity in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:124. Epub 2018/11/06. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0418-x 30386593; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6201509.

25. Singhal A, Buscell P, Lindberg C. Inviting Everyone: Healing Healthcare Through Positive Deviance. Bordentown, NJ: PlexusPress; 2010.

26. Singhal A, Buscell P, Lindberg C. Inspiring Change and Saving Lives: The Positive Deviance Way. Bordentown, NJ: Plexus Press; 2014.

27. Singhal A, McCandless K, P. B, C. L. Spanning silos and spurring conversations: Positive Deviance for reducing infection levels in hospitals. Performance. 2009;2(3):78–83.

28. Herington MJ, van de Fliert E. Positive deviance in theory and practice: a conceptual review. Deviant Behavior. 2018;39(5):664–78. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2017.1286194

29. Singhal A. The Positive Deviance approach to designing and implementing health communication interventions. In: Kim DK, Singhal A, Kreps GL, editors. Global Health Communication Strategies in the 21st Century: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Group; 2014. p. 174–89.

30. Singhal A, Svenkerud PJ. Diffusion of evidence-based interventions or practice-based Positive Deviations. The Journal of Development Communication. 2018;29(2):34–44.

31. Baez S, Rodriguez-Cintron W, Espaillat A, Diaz C, Cantres-Fonseca O. Successful use of a simulation laboratory as a tool to decrease central line blood stream infections (CLABSI). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:A3284-A. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2017.195.1_MeetingAbstracts.A3284

32. Cartier V, Inan C, Zingg W, Delhumeau C, Walder B, Savoldelli GL. Simulation-based medical education training improves short and long-term competency in, and knowledge of central venous catheter insertion: A before and after intervention study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33(8):568–74. Epub 2016/07/02. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000423 27367432.

33. Johnson B. The critical difference: Essays in the contemporary rhetoric of reading. London: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1985.

34. Lindberg C, Downham G, Buscell P, Jones E, Peterson P, Krebs V. Embracing collaboration: a novel strategy for reducing bloodstream infections in outpatient hemodialysis centers. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(6):513–9. Epub 2012/12/12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.07.015 23219669.

35. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013.

36. Suen LJ, Huang HM, Lee HH. [A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling]. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2014;61(3):105–11. Epub 2014/06/06. doi: 10.6224/JN.61.3.105 24899564.

37. Patel PK, Gupta A, Vaughn VM, Mann JD, Ameling JM, Meddings J. Review of strategies to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in Adult ICUs. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(2):105–16. Epub 2017/11/21. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2856 29154382.

38. Tolley EE, Ulin PR, Mack N, Robinson ET, Succop SM. Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2016.

39. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, Fourth Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2015.

40. Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545–7. Epub 2014/08/28. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 25158659.

41. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. Epub 2005/10/06. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 16204405.

42. WHO. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.

43. Boyce JM, Pittet D, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Hand Hygiene Task F. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(12 Suppl):S3–40. Epub 2003/01/08. doi: 10.1086/503164 12515399.

44. Ling ML, Apisarnthanarak A, Jaggi N, Harrington G, Morikane K, Thu le TA, et al. APSIC guide for prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5:16. Epub 2016/05/07. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0116-5 27152193; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4857414.

45. Yokoe DS, Anderson DJ, Berenholtz SM, Calfee DP, Dubberke ER, Ellingson KD, et al. A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 Updates. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(8):820–8. Epub 2014/08/05. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.002 25087135.

46. Clack L, Zingg W, Saint S, Casillas A, Touveneau S, da Liberdade Jantarada F, et al. Implementing infection prevention practices across European hospitals: an in-depth qualitative assessment. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(10):771–80. Epub 2018/06/29. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007675 29950324; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6166596.

47. Srigley JA, Corace K, Hargadon DP, Yu D, MacDonald T, Fabrigar L, et al. Applying psychological frameworks of behaviour change to improve healthcare worker hand hygiene: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2015;91(3):202–10. Epub 2015/09/01. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.019 26321675.

48. Slettli VK, Singhal A. Identification and amplification of tacit knowledge: The positive deviance approach as knowledge management praxis. Electron J Knowl Manag. 2017;1:17–27.

49. Wolfreys J. Deconstruction—Derrida. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press; 1998.

50. James W, Katz E. The Meaning of Truth. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press; 1975.

51. Peirce CS. How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly. 1878;12:286–302.

52. Gerolemou L, Fidellaga A, Rose K, Cooper S, Venturanza M, Aqeel A, et al. Simulation-based training for nurses in sterile techniques during central vein catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 2014;23(1):40–8. Epub 2014/01/03. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014860 24382616.

53. Kim J, Park JH, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:152. Epub 2016/05/25. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7 27215280; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4877810.

54. Cooke L. Assessing concurrent think-aloud protocol as a usability test method: a technical communication approach. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 2010;53(3):202–15. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859

55. Kahneman D, Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and biases. Psychol intuitive Judgm. 2002;49:81.

56. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453–8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683 7455683.

57. Dalton DL, Gee T, Levett-Jones PT. Using clinical reasoning and simulation-based education to ‘flip’ the Enrolled Nurse curriculum. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2015;33(2):28–34.

58. Sreeramoju P, Dura L, Fernandez ME, Minhajuddin A, Simacek K, Fomby TB, et al. Using a positive deviance approach to influence the culture of patient safety related to infection prevention. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(10):ofy231. Epub 2018/10/06. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy231 30288392; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6166267.