Temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury and hemodialysis use in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock
Autoři:
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula aff001; Shannon M. Dunlay aff001; Gregory W. Barsness aff001; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula aff001; Shashaank Vallabhajosyula aff002; Pranathi R. Sundaragiri aff004; Bernard J. Gersh aff001; Allan S. Jaffe aff001; Kianoush Kashani aff002
Působiště autorů:
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United states of America
aff001; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United states of America
aff002; Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United states of America
aff003; Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United states of America
aff004; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United states of America
aff005
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222894
Souhrn
Background
There are limited data on acute kidney injury (AKI) complicating acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study sought to evaluate 15-year national prevalence, temporal trends and outcomes of AKI with no need for hemodialysis (AKI-ND) and requiring hemodialysis (AKI-D) following AMI-CS.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study from 2000–2014 from the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of all community hospitals in the United States). Adult patients (>18 years) admitted with a primary diagnosis of AMI and secondary diagnosis of CS were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality in cohorts with no AKI, AKI-ND, and AKI-D. Secondary outcomes included predictors, resource utilization and disposition.
Results
During this 15-year period, 440,257 admissions for AMI-CS were included, with AKI in 155,610 (35.3%) and hemodialysis use in 14,950 (3.4%). Older age, black race, non-private insurance, higher comorbidity, organ failure, and use of cardiac and non-cardiac organ support were associated with the AKI development and hemodialysis use. There was a 2.6-fold higher adjusted risk of developing AKI in 2014 compared to 2000. Presence of AKI-ND and AKI-D was associated with a 1.3 and 1.7-fold higher adjusted risk of mortality. Compared to the cohort without AKI, AKI-ND and AKI-D were associated with longer length of stay (9±10, 12±13, and 18±19 days respectively; p<0.001) and higher hospitalization costs ($101,859±116,204, $159,804±190,766, and $265,875 ± 254,919 respectively; p<0.001).
Conclusion
AKI-ND and AKI-D are associated with higher in-hospital mortality and resource utilization in AMI-CS.
Klíčová slova:
Biology and life sciences – Research and analysis methods – Population biology – Anatomy – Medicine and health sciences – Population metrics – Death rates – Health care – Health care facilities – Hospitals – Diagnostic medicine – Imaging techniques – Cardiology – Diagnostic radiology – Radiology and imaging – Surgical and invasive medical procedures – Renal system – Kidneys – Cardiovascular medicine – Cardiovascular imaging – Angiography – Cardiovascular procedures – Angioplasty – Coronary angioplasty – Nephrology – Medical dialysis – Myocardial infarction – Cardiac arrest
Zdroje
1. Vallabhajosyula S, Barsness GW, Vallabhajosyula S. Multidisciplinary teams for cardiogenic shock. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(14):4774–6. doi: 10.18632/aging.102104 31314745.
2. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Barsness GW, Rihal CS, Holmes DR Jr., Prasad A. Hospital-level disparities in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124(4):491–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.038 31221462.
3. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Kashani K, Vallabhajosyula S, Vallabhajosyula S, Sundaragiri PR, et al. Temporal trends and outcomes of prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy use in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock in the United States. Int J Cardiol. 2019;285:6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.008 30871802.
4. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Murphree DH, Barsness GW, Sandhu GS, Lerman A, et al. Cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy versus acute myocardial infarction: An 8-year national perspective on clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes. JACC Heart Fail. 2019; 7(6):469–476. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.12.007 31078481
5. Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Prasad A, Kashani K, Sakhuja A, Gersh BJ, et al. Acute noncardiac organ failure in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(14):1781–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.053 30975295.
6. Vallabhajosyula S, Kashani K, Dunlay SM, Vallabhajosyula S, Vallabhajosyula S, Sundaragiri PR, et al. Acute respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the USA, 2000–2014. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0571-2 31463598.
7. Vallabhajosyula S, O’Horo JC, Antharam P, Ananthaneni S, Vallabhajosyula S, Stulak JM, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant impella versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2019. Epub 2019/07/25. doi: 10.1097/mat.0000000000001039 31335363.
8. Vallabhajosyula S, O’Horo JC, Antharam P, Ananthaneni S, Vallabhajosyula S, Stulak JM, et al. Concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump use in cardiogenic shock requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):e006930. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006930 30354593.
9. Vallabhajosyula S, Prasad A, Dunlay SM, Murphree DH Jr., Ingram C, Mueller PS, et al. Utilization of palliative care for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A 15-year national perspective on trends, disparities, predictors, and outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(15):e011954. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011954 31315497.
10. Vallabhajosyula S, Prasad A, Gulati R, Barsness GW. Contemporary prevalence, trends, and outcomes of coronary chronic total occlusions in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. IJC Heart & Vasculature. 2019;24:100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100414.
11. Vallabhajosyula S, Ya’Qoub L, Dunlay SM, Vallabhajosyula S, Vallabhajosyula S, Sundaragiri PR, et al. Sex disparities in acute kidney injury complicating acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6(4):874–7. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12482 31271517
12. Lauridsen MD, Gammelager H, Schmidt M, Rasmussen TB, Shaw RE, Botker HE, et al. Acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy and 5-year mortality after myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Crit Care. 2015;19:452. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1170-8 26715162
13. Amin AP, Salisbury AC, McCullough PA, Gosch K, Spertus JA, Venkitachalam L, et al. Trends in the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(3):246–53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1202 22332157.
14. Dasta JF, Kane-Gill S. Review of the literature on the costs associated with acute kidney injury. J Pharm Pract. 2019;32(3):292–302. doi: 10.1177/0897190019852556 31291842.
15. Kashani K, Rosner MH, Haase M, Lewington AJP, O’Donoghue DJ, Wilson FP, et al. Quality improvement goals for acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(6):941–53. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01250119 31101671
16. Vallabhajosyula S, Sakhuja A, Geske JB, Kumar M, Kashyap R, Kashani K, et al. Clinical profile and outcomes of acute cardiorenal syndrome type-5 in sepsis: An eight-year cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190965 29315332
17. Sakhuja A, Kumar G, Gupta S, Mittal T, Taneja A, Nanchal RS. Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis in severe sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(8):951–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0329OC 26120892.
18. Kotecha A, Vallabhajosyula S, Coville HH, Kashani K. Cardiorenal syndrome in sepsis: A narrative review. J Crit Care. 2018;43:122–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.044 28881261.
19. Adegbala O, Inampudi C, Adejumo A, Otuonye G, Akintoye E, Elsayed R, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock utilizing hemodialysis for acute kidney injury. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(11):1816–21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.038 30967283.
20. Introduction to the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_2009_INTRODUCTION.pdf. Accessed Jan 18, 2015.: HCUP; [Jan 18, 2015].
21. Waikar SS, Wald R, Chertow GM, Curhan GC, Winkelmayer WC, Liangos O, et al. Validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(6):1688–94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006010073 16641149.
22. Vallabhajosyula S, Arora S, Lahewala S, Kumar V, Shantha GPS, Jentzer JC, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device surgery. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(22):e010193. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010193 30571481.
23. Vallabhajosyula S, Arora S, Sakhuja A, Lahewala S, Kumar V, Shantha GPS, et al. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support for postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(3):489–97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.029 30473325.
24. Sinha SS, Sjoding MW, Sukul D, Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Gurm HS, et al. Changes in primary noncardiac diagnoses over time among elderly cardiac intensive care unit patients in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(8):e003616. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003616 28794121
25. Jentzer JC, Bennett C, Wiley BM, Murphree DH, Keegan MT, Gajic O, et al. Predictive value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for mortality in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(6):008169. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008169 29525785
26. Ko DT, Wang Y, Alter DA, Curtis JP, Rathore SS, Stukel TA, et al. Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(7):716–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.039 18279735.
27. Chan L, Mehta S, Chauhan K, Poojary P, Patel S, Pawar S, et al. National trends and impact of acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis in hospitalizations with atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(12):004509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004509 27998917
28. Correa A, Patel A, Chauhan K, Shah H, Saha A, Dave M, et al. National trends and outcomes in dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury in heart failure: 2002–2013. J Card Fail. 2018;24(7):442–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.05.001 29730235.
29. Hsu RK, McCulloch CE, Heung M, Saran R, Shahinian VB, Pavkov ME, et al. Exploring potential reasons for the temporal trend in dialysis-requiring AKI in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(1):14–20. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04520415 26683890
30. Lim HS, Howell N. Cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure and acute myocardial infarction: characteristics and outcome of temporary mechanical circulatory support. Shock. 2018;50(2):167–72. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001052 29112104.
31. Kane-Gill SL, Sileanu FE, Murugan R, Trietley GS, Handler SM, Kellum JA. Risk factors for acute kidney injury in older adults with critical illness: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(6):860–9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.10.018 25488106
32. Vallabhajosyula S, Trivedi V, Gajic O. Ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: importance of low-tidal volume. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(24):496. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.36 28149858
33. Ahmed A, Vairavan S, Akhoundi A, Wilson G, Chiofolo C, Chbat N, et al. Development and validation of electronic surveillance tool for acute kidney injury: A retrospective analysis. J Crit Care. 2015;30(5):988–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.007 26070247.
34. Ronco C, Rizo-Topete L, Serrano-Soto M, Kashani K. Pro: Prevention of acute kidney injury: time for teamwork and new biomarkers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(3):408–13. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx016 28375502.
35. Sakhuja A, Bandak G, Barreto EF, Vallabhajosyula S, Jentzer J, Albright R, et al. Role of loop diuretic challenge in stage 3 acute kidney injury. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(8):1509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.040 31279541.
36. Ronco C, Haapio M, House AA, Anavekar N, Bellomo R. Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(19):1527–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.051 19007588.
37. Jentzer JC, Vallabhajosyula S, Khanna AK, Chawla LS, Busse LW, Kashani KB. Management of refractory vasodilatory shock. Chest. 2018; 154(2):416–426. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.021 29329694.
38. Moman RN, Ostby SA, Akhoundi A, Kashyap R, Kashani K. Impact of individualized target mean arterial pressure for septic shock resuscitation on the incidence of acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0468-5 30535664
39. Ostermann M, Liu K, Kashani K. Fluid management in acute kidney injury. Chest. 2019. Epub 2019/04/20. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.004 31002784.
40. Tumlin JA, Murugan R, Deane AM, Ostermann M, Busse LW, Ham KR, et al. Outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock and renal replacement therapy treated with intravenous Angiotensin II. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(6):949–57. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003092 29509568
41. Vallabhajosyula S, Patlolla SH, Sandhyavenu H, Vallabhajosyula S, Barsness GW, Dunlay SM, et al. Periprocedural cardiopulmonary bypass or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(14):009608. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009608 29987125
42. Adler C, Reuter H, Seck C, Hellmich M, Zobel C. Fluid therapy and acute kidney injury in cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84(2):194–9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.06.013 22750662.
43. Siew ED, Davenport A. The growth of acute kidney injury: a rising tide or just closer attention to detail? Kidney Int. 2015;87(1):46–61. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.293 25229340
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 9
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Graviola (Annona muricata) attenuates behavioural alterations and testicular oxidative stress induced by streptozotocin in diabetic rats
- CH(II), a cerebroprotein hydrolysate, exhibits potential neuro-protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease
- Comparison between Aptima Assays (Hologic) and the Allplex STI Essential Assay (Seegene) for the diagnosis of Sexually transmitted infections
- Assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity using CareStart G6PD rapid diagnostic test and associated genetic variants in Plasmodium vivax malaria endemic setting in Mauritania