Reasons to care: Personal motivation as a key factor in the practice of the professional foster carer in Romania
Autoři:
Alexandru Neagoe aff001; Doina Larisa Maria Neag aff001; Daniel Lucheș aff002
Působiště autorů:
Department of Social Work, The West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania
aff001; Department of Sociology, The West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania
aff002
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222716
Souhrn
Personal motivation is a key factor in the service of foster care, impending both on the welfare of the child and on the satisfaction of the carer. This paper explores the benefits, challenges and dilemmas involved in the job of professional (i.e. state-supported) foster carer in Romania–a country where the issue of child protection has drawn a great deal of international attention over the last thirty years. The principal hypothesis concerns whether the benefits, challenges and dilemmas identified by foster carers are influenced by the factors that led to their taking up this kind of work. Quantitative research was conducted using a questionnaire as the main tool. The paper takes a descriptive, cross-sectional and multifactorial approach. Sampling was carried out by self-selecting method, and the study involved 51 participants. The research project identified a statistically significant variation in the challenges and dilemmas reported by foster carers. Thus, the results of the study show that the majority of the carers indicate a primarily intrinsic motivation for their work. By way of conclusion, it is argued that social workers, operating in collaboration with multidisciplinary teams, can offer carers support in managing more difficult periods in the child–carer relationship, thus enhancing the sustainability of the foster care service.
Klíčová slova:
Biology and life sciences – Research and analysis methods – Neuroscience – Cognitive science – Cognitive psychology – Psychology – Social sciences – Sociology – People and places – Population groupings – Professions – Geographical locations – Europe – Medicine and health sciences – Pediatrics – Economics – Research design – Public and occupational health – Labor economics – Behavior – Survey research – Age groups – Children – Families – Salaries – European Union – Questionnaires – Epidemiology – Medical risk factors – Social cognition – Social psychology – Traumatic injury risk factors – Prosocial behavior – Anthropology – Cultural anthropology – Religion – Criminology – Crime – Child abuse – Altruistic behavior – Romania
Zdroje
1. Cole S. Foster Caregiver Motivation and Infant Attachment: How do Reasons for Fostering Affect Relationships? CASW Journal 2005;22(5–6), 441–457. doi: 10.1007/s10560-005-0021-x
2. MacGregor TE, Rodger S, Cummings AL, Leschied AW. The Needs of Foster Parents: A Qualitative Study of Motivation, Support, and Retention. Qual Soc Work. 2006;5:3, 351–368. doi: 10.1177/1473325006067365
3. Rodger S, Cummings A, Leschied AW. Who is caring for our most vulnerable children? The motivation to foster in child welfare. Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30:10, 1129–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.04.005 17014907
4. Sebba J. Why do people become foster carers? An international literature review on the motivation to foster. Oxford: The Rees Centre; 2012.
5. Tyebjee T. Attitude, interest, and motivation for adoption and foster care. Child Welfare. 2003;82:6, 685–706. 14736030
6. Nelson CA, Fox NA, Zeanah CH. Romania's abandoned children. Cambridge, MA & London, UK: Harvard University Press; 2014.
7. Matichescu ML, Dragan A, Lucheș D. Channels to the West: exploring the migration routes between Romania and France. Sustainability 2007;9(10): 1861.
8. Lucheş D, Vasilcu D, Gălbău I. Health and education in roma families. Comparative study, Romanian Roma families from Rennes France versus Roma from Mironu, Suceava, Romania, European Review of Applied Sociology. 2016;9(12): 47–53. doi: 10.1515/eras-2016-0005
9. Șandor SD, Popescu M. Religiosity and values in Romania. Tnansylv Rev Adm Sci. 2008;22E: 171–180. Available from: http://www.rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/387/377
10. Cojocaru D, Cojocaru Ș, Sandu A. The role of religion in the system of social and medical services in post-communism Romania. JSRI. 2011;10(28): 65–83. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1767661
11. Autoritatea Naţională pentru Protecţia Drepturilor Copilului și Adopție [National Child Protection and Adoption Authority]. Evoluții în domeniul protecției copilului [Developments in the area of child protection]. (Statistical report l 4). 2017 Bucharest: Ministerul Muncii și Justiției Sociale [Ministry of Labour and Social Justice]. Available from: http://www.mmuncii.ro/j33/images/buletin_statistic/copil_an2017.pdf [Cited 2018 July 9].
12. Neamţu G, coordinator. Enciclopedia asistenţei sociale [Encyclopedia of Social Work]. Iași: Polirom; 2016.
13. Sansone C, Harackiewicz JM, editors. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.
14. Frey BS, Osterloh M, editors. Successful management by motivation: balancing intrinsic and extrinsic incentives. Berlin: Springer; 2002.
15. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
16. Gherasim RL. Determinanţi ai motivaţiei în muncă: de la teorie la analiza realităţii organizaţionale [Factors determining motivation in work: from theory to the analysis of the way things are actually organised]. Iași: Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”; 2009.
17. Barber JG, Delfabbro PH. Children in foster care. London: Routledge; 2004.
18. Melenciuc S. Romania’s average wage reached EUR 600 in November 2018. Business Review. 2019 Jan 11. Available from: http://business-review.eu/money/romanias-average-wage-reached-eur-600-in-november-2018-194591
19. Chipungu SS, Bent-Goodley T. Meeting the challenges of contemporary foster care. Future Child. 2004;14(1): 74–93. 15072019.
20. Gofman A. Durkheim’s Theory of Social Solidarity and Social Rules. In Jeffries V, editor. The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. pp. 45–69. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137391865_3 [Cited 2018 September 10].
21. Haydon G. Values for educational leadership (1st ed). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2007. doi: 10.4135/9781446214640
22. Fundaţia Agapedia România [The Agapedia Romania Foundation] Manualul asistentului maternal profesionist [The Professional Foster Carer's Handbook]. Brașov: Transilvania Expres; 2007. Available from: http://www.agapedia.ro/publicatii/Manualul_asistentului_maternal_profesionist.pdf [Cited 2018 July 3].
23. Spencer S. Fostering inclusive values in children: what families can do. Teach Except Child. 2004;37(1): 64–69. Available from: http://dsagsl.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Families-foster-inclusive-values.pdf [Cited 2018 June 28].
24. Runcan PL, Goian C, Țâru L. The socio-communicational style and the need for supervision of professionals from the social services. Rev Cercet Interv So. 2012;37: 180–195. Available from: http://www.rcis.ro/ro/section1/48-volumul-372012iunie/428-the-socio-communicational-style-and-the-need-for-supervision-of-professionals-from-the-social-services.html
25. Goian C. Transnational wellbeing analysis of the needs of professionals and learners engaged in adult education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;142: 380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.695
26. Capraro V, Rand DG. Do the Right Thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality. Judgm Decis Mak. 2018;13(1): 99–111, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2965067
27. Tappina BM, Capraro V. Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;79: 64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.005
28. Capraro V, Jagfeld G, Mul M, van de Pol I. Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Sci Rep. 2019;9. Forthcoming.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 9
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Je Fuchsova endotelová dystrofie rohovky neurodegenerativní onemocnění?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Graviola (Annona muricata) attenuates behavioural alterations and testicular oxidative stress induced by streptozotocin in diabetic rats
- CH(II), a cerebroprotein hydrolysate, exhibits potential neuro-protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease
- Comparison between Aptima Assays (Hologic) and the Allplex STI Essential Assay (Seegene) for the diagnosis of Sexually transmitted infections
- Assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity using CareStart G6PD rapid diagnostic test and associated genetic variants in Plasmodium vivax malaria endemic setting in Mauritania