Reading skill modulates the effect of parafoveal distractors on foveal lexical decision in deaf students
Autoři:
Jiayu Tao aff001; Zhao Qin aff001; Zhu Meng aff001; Li Zhang aff001; Lu Liu aff003; Guoli Yan aff001; Valerie Benson aff004
Působiště autorů:
Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China
aff001; Department of Psychology, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China
aff002; School of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China
aff003; School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
aff004
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221891
Souhrn
In low-level perceptual tasks and reading tasks, deaf individuals show a redistribution of spatial visual attention toward the parafoveal and peripheral visual fields. In the present study, the experiment adopted the modified flanker paradigm and utilized a lexical decision task to investigate how these unique visual skills may influence foveal lexical access in deaf individuals. It was predicted that irrelevant linguistic stimuli presented in parafoveal vision, during a lexical decision task, would produce a larger interference effect for deaf college student readers if the stimuli acted as distractors during the task. The results showed there was a larger interference effect in deaf college student readers compared to the interference effect observed in participants with typical levels of hearing. Furthermore, deaf college student readers with low-skilled reading levels showed a larger interference effect than those with high-skilled reading levels. The current study demonstrates that the redistribution of spatial visual attention toward the parafoveal visual regions in deaf students impacts foveal lexical processing, and this effect is modulated by reading skill. The findings are discussed in relation to the potential effect that enhanced parafoveal attention may have on everyday reading for deaf individuals.
Klíčová slova:
Biology and life sciences – Neuroscience – Cognitive science – Cognitive psychology – Psychology – Social sciences – Sociology – Medicine and health sciences – Behavior – Education – Schools – Otorhinolaryngology – Sensory perception – Otology – Hearing disorders – Deafness – Vision – Attention – Language – Linguistics – Neurolinguistics – Lexical decision tasks – Verbal behavior – Verbal communication
Zdroje
1. Bavelier D, Neville HJ. Cross-modal plasticity:where and how? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002;3(6):443–52. Epub 2002/06/04. doi: 10.1038/nrn848 12042879.
2. Dye MW, Bavelier D. Attentional enhancements and deficits in deaf populations: An integrative review. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2010;28(2):181–92. Epub 2010/04/21. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0501 20404407.
3. Bavelier D, Dye MW, Hauser PC. Do deaf individuals see better? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(11):512–8. Epub 2006/10/04. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006 17015029.
4. Codina CJ, Pascalis O, Baseler HA, Levine AT, Buckley D. Peripheral visual reaction time is faster in deaf adults and British sign language interpreters than in hearing adults. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:50. Epub 2017/02/22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00050 28220085.
5. Hauthal N, Sandmann P, Debener S, Thorne JD. Visual movement perception in deaf and hearing individuals. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2013;9(2):53–61. Epub 2013/07/05. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0131-z 23826037.
6. Dye MW, Hauser PC, Bavelier D. Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5640. Epub 2009/05/23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005640 19462009.
7. Bavelier D, Tomann A, Hutton C, Mitchell T, Corina D, Liu G, et al. Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. Journal of Neuroscience. 2000;20(17):RC93. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-17-j0001.2000 10952732.
8. Bavelier D, Brozinsky C, Tomann A, Mitchell T, Neville H, Liu G. Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21(22):8931–42. Epub 2001/11/08. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-22-08931.2001 11698604.
9. Proksch J, Bavelier D. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2002;14(5):687–701. Epub 2002/08/09. doi: 10.1162/08989290260138591 12167254.
10. Dye MW. Foveal processing under concurrent peripheral load in profoundly deaf adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2016;21(2):122–8. Epub 2015/12/15. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env054 26657078.
11. Kelly LP, Barac-Cikoja D. The comprehension of skilled deaf readers: The roles of word recognition and other potentially critical aspects of competence. In: Cain K, Oakhill J, editors. Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 244–79.
12. Rayner K, Murphy LA, Henderson JM, Pollatsek A. Selective attentional dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1989;6(4):357–78. doi: 10.1080/02643298908253288
13. Casco C, Tressoldi PE, Dellantonio A. Visual selective attention and reading efficiency are related in children. Cortex. 1998;34(4):531–46. Epub 1998/11/04. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70512-4 9800088.
14. Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Pedrolli K, Facoetti A. A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology. 2012;22(9):814–9. Epub 2012/04/10. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013 22483940.
15. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2009;62(8):1457–506. Epub 2009/05/19. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461 19449261.
16. Liu L, Yan G. Effect of parafoveal visual attention enhancement in deaf reading:Evidence from disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2018;50(7):715–26. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00715
17. Schotter ER, Angele B, Rayner K. Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2012;74(1):5–35. Epub 2011/11/02. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2 22042596.
18. Dye MW, Hauser PC, Bavelier D. Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers:Possible implications for acquiring meaning from print. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2008;1145:71–82. Epub 2008/12/17. doi: 10.1196/annals.1416.013 19076390.
19. Bélanger NN, Slattery TJ, Mayberry RI, Rayner K. Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science. 2012;23(7):816–23. Epub 2012/06/12. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435130 22683830.
20. Yan M, Pan J, Bélanger NN, Shu H. Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2015;41(1):254–61. Epub 2014/07/08. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000035 24999711.
21. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics. 1974;16(1):143–9. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
22. Mayberry RI, del Giudice AA, Lieberman AM. Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2011;16(2):164–88. Epub 2010/11/13. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq049 21071623.
23. Westfall J. PANGEA: Power ANalysis for GEneral Anova designs. 2015. Available from: http://jakewestfall.org/publications/pangea.pdf.
24. Zang C, Fu Y, Bai X, Yan G, Liversedge SP. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2018;44(12):1831–41. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000589 30475051.
25. Zhang F, Li D. Deaf students’ syntactic awareness of the “shi…de” construction in sentence reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2017;49(11):1383–91. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01383
26. Zhang H, Lv H, Wu L. The development of Chinese curriculum for deaf college students. Beijing: Huaxia Press; 2009.
27. Li D, Hu K, Chen G, Jin Y, Li M. Combined Raven's Test (CRT) Shanghai area test report. Journal of Psychological Science. 1988;11(4):27–31. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.1988.04.007
28. Zhang H, Wang X. Standardization research on Raven's standard progressive matrices in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 1989;21(2):113–21.
29. Dare N, Shillcock R. Serial and parallel processing in reading: Investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2013;66(3):487–504. Epub 2012/09/07. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.703212 22950804.
30. Snell J, Grainger J. Parallel word processing in the flanker paradigm has a rightward bias. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 2018;80(6):1512–9. Epub 2018/06/03. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1547-2 29858975.
31. Cai Q, Brysbaert M. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e10729. Epub 2010/06/10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 20532192.
32. Liu L. The effect of parafoveal visual attention enhancement in deaf reading [dissertation]. Tianjin Normal University; 2017.
33. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4. 2017. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package = lme4
34. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria. 2017. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.
35. Bélanger NN, Rayner K. Frequency and predictability effects in eye fixations for skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. Visual Cognition. 2013;21(4):477–97. Epub 2013/08/27. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.804016 23976872.
36. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59(4):390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
37. Bélanger NN, Lee M, Schotter ER. Young skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2018;71(1):291–301. Epub 2017/04/28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1324498 28447500.
38. Inhoff AW, Starr M, Shindler KL. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? Perception & Psychophysics. 2000;62(7):1474–84. doi: 10.3758/BF03212147 11143457.
39. Rayner K, Pollatsek A, Ashby J, Clifton C Jr. Psychology of reading. New York: Psychology Press; 2012.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 9
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Graviola (Annona muricata) attenuates behavioural alterations and testicular oxidative stress induced by streptozotocin in diabetic rats
- CH(II), a cerebroprotein hydrolysate, exhibits potential neuro-protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease
- Comparison between Aptima Assays (Hologic) and the Allplex STI Essential Assay (Seegene) for the diagnosis of Sexually transmitted infections
- Assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity using CareStart G6PD rapid diagnostic test and associated genetic variants in Plasmodium vivax malaria endemic setting in Mauritania